Abstract
Over the last 15 years there have been many experiments with joined-up (also known as whole of) government practices, aimed at horizontal coordination to overcome the fragmentation of vertical governmental structures due to departmentalism and New Public Management. These practices were initiated to address wicked problems and to better interact with society at large. Now that there are signs that the rhetoric of joined-up government is winding down and many joined-up government developments are being dismantled, it is time to evaluate this approach. This is especially appropriate as some suggest that the overall impact of these developments may be relatively small, despite (overly) optimistic claims made in the past. In this article we take experiences with joined-up government in the Netherlands as the departing point for a critical discussion of this approach. By comparing the Dutch experiences with those in other countries, we will draw a picture of the challenges and dilemmas of horizontal coordination in the vertical world of government.
Notes
1Some authors see joined-up and whole of government as two connected but slightly different phenomena. In this article, we treat both interchangeably.
2Ella Vogelaar resigned in November 2008, after losing her party's support after several highly mediatised gaffes and was replaced by Eberhard van der Laan, a lawyer and now mayor of Amsterdam.
3These were the Ministry for Social Affairs and Employment, the Ministry for Education, Culture and Sciences, the Ministry for the Interior and Kingdom Relations, the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sport, the Program Ministry for Youth & Families, the Ministry for Economic Affairs, the Ministry for Finance, and the Ministry for Agriculture, Nature, and Food Quality.