438
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Response of Young Citrus Trees on Selected Rootstocks to Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Fertilization

, , , &
Pages 1371-1385 | Received 24 Nov 2003, Accepted 05 Oct 2005, Published online: 14 Feb 2007
 

ABSTRACT

The majority of the citriculture in Brazil is located in the state of São Paulo, with a total production area of 700,000 ha. Trees are grafted mostly on ‘Rangpur’ lime (RL; Citrus limonia Osbeck) rootstock. Despite its good horticultural performance, use of other rootstocks has increased with the search for disease-tolerant varieties to improve grove productivity and longevity. Furthermore, there is a lack of information on young tree response to fertilization, and optimal nutrient requirements of different scion/rootstock combinations for maximum fruit yield. A network of field experiments was conducted to study the differential response of young sweet orange trees on selected rootstocks to nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilization. The application of soil and leaf analyses to develop optimal fertilizer recommendations was evaluated. Experiments were conducted in three locations using fractional factorial design of one-half (4 × 4 × 4) type with four rates of N, P, or K calculated to be applied for five years after tree planting. Fruit yield response was evaluated during the last two years and correlated with soil and leaf analyses data. The trees on RL rootstock demonstrated increased efficiency of nutrient use and fruit production compared with those on ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin (CL; C. reshni hort. ex Tanaka) or ‘Swingle’ citrumelo [SW; Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. × C. × paradisi Macfad.] rootstocks. The trees on SW rootstock appeared to require greater N and K rates than those on RL rootstock. Phosphorus requirement was greater for ‘Natal’ or ‘Valencia’ trees on CL than on RL rootstock. These results will become the basis for revising current fertilizer recommendation guidelines for young trees in Brazil.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank the Fapesp Foundation (Research grants 95/06611-1 and 96/00829-8), the Estação Experimental de Citricultura de Bebedouro, and the Cambuhy Agrícola and Guacho Agropecuária farms for their support.

Notes

1, 2, 3, and 4 represents the nutrient level within treatments.

P = ‘Pêra,’ V = ‘Valencia,’ and N = ‘Natal’ sweet oranges; RL = ‘Rangpur’ lime, CL = ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin, and SW = ‘Swingle’ citrumelo rootstocks.

Y = b0+b1N + b2N2 + b3P + b4P2 + b5K + b6K2 + b7NP + b8NK + b9PK. Rates of N, P, and K are total g N, P, or K per tree applied from the first to the fifth years after tree planting.

§ Fruit yield = cumulative value for the 4th and 5th year after tree planting (n = 32).

∗,∗∗ Significant at P = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 495.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.