330
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effect of Sulfur and Iron on Enzymatic Activity and Chlorophyll Content of Mungbean

, , &
Pages 1451-1467 | Received 21 May 2005, Accepted 05 Dec 2005, Published online: 14 Feb 2007
 

ABSTRACT

A field trial was conducted at Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, India, in the summers of 2002 and 2003 to determine the effect of sulfur (S) in improving iron (Fe) nutrition of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) grown on calcareous soils. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. Four levels of sulfur (0, 20, 40, and 60 kg S ha−1) were applied in main plots. In sub-plots, eight levels of Fe were replicated. Three levels of Fe were applied as a basal application of FeSO4 (0, 12.5, and 25.0 kg FeSO4 ha−1) and the remaining five were applied as a foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 at branching, flowering, and at both branching and flowering with or without 0.1% citric acid. The results of the experiment revealed that application of sulfur at the higher doses had a significant positive effect on activities of catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, guaiacol peroxidase, synthesis of chlorophyll, and active Fe content of green leaves compared with lower doses. Application of 0.5% FeSO4 and 0.1% citric acid at both branching and flowering had no effect. The best results were recorded with basal application of 25.0 kg FeSO4 in combination with 40 kg S ha−1. The frequency of foliar application had an appreciable effect on chlorophyll synthesis, enzymatic activities, and active Fe content in green leaves. Plants that received foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at both branching and flowering responded more than those that received treatment at either branching or flowering. For best results, it is suggested to use 25.0 kg FeSO4 ha−1 in a basal application along with 40 kg S ha−1, as plants require most of their S and Fe at the early growth stages.

Notes

1Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at branching.

2Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at flowering.

3Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at both branching and flowering.

4Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 at both branching and flowering.

5Foliar application of 0.1% citric acid at both branching and flowering.

1Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at branching.

2Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at flowering.

3Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at both branching and flowering.

4Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 at both branching and flowering.

5Foliar application of 0.1% citric acid at both branching and flowering.

1Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at branching.

2Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at flowering.

3Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid at both branching and flowering.

4Foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 at both branching and flowering.

5Foliar application of 0.1% citric acid at both branching and flowering.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 495.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.