Figures & data
Figure 2. Percentage of employees wearing their lanyard per measurement (bold) and per counting instance (non-bold). Supervisors form a subgroup of employees. Due to the small number of supervisors per counting instance, only the average over all counting instances is displayed for them.
![Figure 2. Percentage of employees wearing their lanyard per measurement (bold) and per counting instance (non-bold). Supervisors form a subgroup of employees. Due to the small number of supervisors per counting instance, only the average over all counting instances is displayed for them.](/cms/asset/738b163f-c6bd-46b6-84dd-8867e72e5cf9/hbas_a_1917412_f0002_b.jpg)
Table 1. Summary statistics for the ωc and ωc – c’ parameters.
Figure 3. Answer distributions for self-reported compliance (left) and paternalism ratings of the nudges (right).
![Figure 3. Answer distributions for self-reported compliance (left) and paternalism ratings of the nudges (right).](/cms/asset/69d17eea-d76f-48f3-bdee-0c3ca7b226cb/hbas_a_1917412_f0003_b.jpg)
Table 2. Codes related to the lanyard policy and the nudges with a minimum prevalence of 10%.
Supplemental Material
Download MS Word (36.1 KB)Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.