Tailored approaches of data collection for improved water system management in resource constrained contexts: lessons from Ethiopia

Figures & data

Figure 1. Map of Ethiopia, Wolaita Zone, and Boloso Sore woreda.

Figure 2. Spatial distribution water schemes status in Bolosso Sore woreda, 2021.

Figure 3. Functionality status by water schemes in Wolaita Zone, 2021.

Figure 4. Water point functionality by kebele, Bolosso Sore woreda, 2021.

Table 1. Number of people served by water point, by type (FDRE, 2018).

Type of water point	One WASH Programme Document Phase II-National Standard for GTPI and GPTII (FDRE, 2018)	One WASH Programme Document Phase II-National Standard for GPTII (FDRE, 2018)
Dug well with Indian Mark II/Afridev Pump	270	160
Shallow borehole with hand pump	500	250
Spring at a spot	350	200
Shallow borehole with submersible pump	1500	1450
Spring with piped scheme	4000	3000
Deep borehole with piped scheme	3500	2000

Source: Adank and Hailegiorgis (2018), Adank et al. (2019).

Table 2. Shallow borehole scheme service coverage by kebeles in Bolosso Sore

Kebele	No. of user HHs 1.5 km radius	No. of functional shallow boreholes	SB × capacity to serve (functional SBs × 1450)	No. individuals (user HHs × 5)	Percentage coverage
Adimanicho Arefita	659	0	0	3295	0
Dolla	2400	0	0	12,000	0
Gara Goda	618	0	0	3090	0
Yukara	578	0	0	2890	0
Gurumo Koyisha	1185	1	1450	5925	24.5
Danigara Madalicho	783	1	1450	3915	37.0
Danigara Salata	693	1	1450	3465	41.8
Sore Homiba	575	1	1450	2875	50.4
Woyibo	192	1	1450	960	151.0
Total	7683	5	7250	38,415	18.9

HHs = households; SB = shallow borehole.

Source: Field collection data.

Table 3. Shallow well scheme service coverage of kebeles in Bolosso Sore

Kebele	No. of user HHs 1.5 km radius	No. of functional shallow wells	SW capacity to serve (functional SW × 250)	No. individuals (user HHs × 5)	Percentage coverage
Dache Gofara	70	0	0	350	0.0
Dola	259.8	1	250	1,299	19.2
Woybo Woga	276	2	500	1,380	36.2
Afama Adila	126	1	250	630	39.7
Dubo	502	4	1,000	2,510	39.8
Doge Woybo	491	4	1,000	2,455	40.7
Yukara	360	3	750	1,800	41.7
Tiyo Hembicho	459	4	1,000	2,295	43.6
Tadisa	342	3	750	1,710	43.9
Adimanicho Arefita	110	1	250	550	45.5
Afama Mino	110	1	250	550	45.5
Dangere Selata	110	1	250	550	45.5
Gido Homba	957	9	2,250	4,785	47.0
Basa Gofera	714	7	1,750	3,570	49.0
Chama Hembecho	885	9	2,250	4,425	50.8
Gara Goda	488	5	1,250	2,440	51.2
Hembecho Tadagi	95	1	250	475	52.6
Werimuma	660.6	7	1,750	3,303	53.0
Sore Homba	540	6	1,500	2,700	55.6
Shoye Homba	894	10	2,500	4,470	55.9
Achura Mazegaja	175	2	500	875	57.1
Achura	611	7	1,750	3,055	57.3
Legama	258	3	750	1,290	58.1
Matala Himbecho	258	3	750	1,290	58.1
Korke Doge	78	1	250	390	64.1
Hembecho	60	1	250	300	83.3
Total	9,889.4	96	24,000	49,447	48.5

HHs = Households; SW = shallow well.

Source: Field collection data.

FDRE (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia). (2018). One Wash national program - a multi-sectoral SWAp, phase 2 program document. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia.

 Google Scholar

Adank, M., & Hailegiorgis, B. (2018, November). Sustaining rural water services in ethiopia: Rural water service levels report. 1.

 Google Scholar

Adank, M., Hailegiorgis, B., & Butterworth, J. (2019). A local systems analysis for rural water services delivery in South Ari and mile, Ethiopia. Research Report, Sustainable WASH Systems Learning Partnership.

 Google Scholar