1,729
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Fluctuations of floods of the River Morava (Czech Republic) in the 1691–2009 period: interactions of natural and anthropogenic factors

Fluctuations des crues de la Rivière Morava (République Tchèque) au cours de la période 1691–2009: interactions entre facteurs naturels et anthropiques

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 468-485 | Received 26 May 2010, Accepted 12 Jan 2011, Published online: 26 Apr 2011

Figures & data

Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of the River Morava catchment in the territory of the Czech Republic, indicating the section of the river studied and the hydrological stations used in the study.

Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of the River Morava catchment in the territory of the Czech Republic, indicating the section of the river studied and the hydrological stations used in the study.

Table 1  Selected characteristics of the hydrological stations used for the study on the River Morava (Q a : long-term mean annual discharge, 1931–1980)

Table 2  Proportion (%) of individual categories of land use in the River Morava catchment (from its source to the Dyje mouth) in the four selected periods

Fig. 2 Changes in land use of the River Morava catchment (from its source to the Dyje mouth) between the years 1836–1841 and 2002–2006.

Fig. 2 Changes in land use of the River Morava catchment (from its source to the Dyje mouth) between the years 1836–1841 and 2002–2006.

Fig. 3 The section of the River Morava between Uherské Hradiště (Hradisch) and Rohatec (Rohatez) on the Norbert von Linck map, 1719 (Source: MZA – D22). The river was of anabranching character with several meandering channels in many places.

Fig. 3 The section of the River Morava between Uherské Hradiště (Hradisch) and Rohatec (Rohatez) on the Norbert von Linck map, 1719 (Source: MZA – D22). The river was of anabranching character with several meandering channels in many places.

Table 3  Reservoirs on the tributaries of the River Morava (Broža et al., Citation2005)

Fig. 4 Variation of floods exceeding the two-year peak discharge Q 2 at four hydrological stations on the River Morava in the period 1916–2009 with respect to their N-year return period and their occurrence in the summer (1: May–October) and the winter (2: November–April) hydrological half-years (* denotes the half-years in which there occurred more than one flood with Qk Q 2; ↓ denotes the beginnings of the series of peak discharges).

Fig. 4 Variation of floods exceeding the two-year peak discharge Q 2 at four hydrological stations on the River Morava in the period 1916–2009 with respect to their N-year return period and their occurrence in the summer (1: May–October) and the winter (2: November–April) hydrological half-years (* denotes the half-years in which there occurred more than one flood with Qk ≥ Q 2; ↓ denotes the beginnings of the series of peak discharges).

Fig. 5 Comparison of relative frequencies for the concurrent occurrence of floods with Q 2, Q 5, Q 10, Q 20 for station couples on the middle Morava (OLOM: Olomouc; KROM: Kroměříž; SPYT: Spytihněv; STRA: Strážnice), and/or on the Bečva (TEPL: Teplice nad Bečvou), always for the common longest period of measurements at the given couple of stations (see ). Figures at each couple indicate percentage of all common floods with Qk Q 2 in relation to the station downstream.

Fig. 5 Comparison of relative frequencies for the concurrent occurrence of floods with Q 2, Q 5, Q 10, Q 20 for station couples on the middle Morava (OLOM: Olomouc; KROM: Kroměříž; SPYT: Spytihněv; STRA: Strážnice), and/or on the Bečva (TEPL: Teplice nad Bečvou), always for the common longest period of measurements at the given couple of stations (see Table 1). Figures at each couple indicate percentage of all common floods with Qk ≥ Q 2 in relation to the station downstream.

Fig. 6 Fluctuations of relative annual peak water stages at selected hydrological stations on the middle Morava in the years 1881–1920 and frequency of floods per year of the summer (1) and winter (2) types.

Fig. 6 Fluctuations of relative annual peak water stages at selected hydrological stations on the middle Morava in the years 1881–1920 and frequency of floods per year of the summer (1) and winter (2) types.

Table 4  List of floods recorded in documentary evidence for the middle Morava in the 16th–17th centuries

Fig. 7 Decadal frequencies of floods on the middle Morava according to documentary evidence in the period 1691–1880 and differentiation of flood types (1: summer, 2: winter, 3: unclear).

Fig. 7 Decadal frequencies of floods on the middle Morava according to documentary evidence in the period 1691–1880 and differentiation of flood types (1: summer, 2: winter, 3: unclear).

Fig. 8 Decadal frequencies of the occurrence of floods on the middle Morava in the years 1691–2009 according to systematic instrumental measurements and documentary sources and differentiation of flood types (1: summer, 2: winter, 3: unclear).

Fig. 8 Decadal frequencies of the occurrence of floods on the middle Morava in the years 1691–2009 according to systematic instrumental measurements and documentary sources and differentiation of flood types (1: summer, 2: winter, 3: unclear).

Fig. 9 Component scores of the first principal component PC1 calculated using PCA for 26 winter floods on the River Morava at Kroměříž in the days D – 4 to D – 1 for the period 1881–2003 (L: low; H: high). Explained variance of the SLP field: D – 4: 37.0%; D – 3: 37.1%; D – 2: 34.6%; and D – 1: 29.0%. The black dot shows the position of the Morava catchment.

Fig. 9 Component scores of the first principal component PC1 calculated using PCA for 26 winter floods on the River Morava at Kroměříž in the days D – 4 to D – 1 for the period 1881–2003 (L: low; H: high). Explained variance of the SLP field: D – 4: 37.0%; D – 3: 37.1%; D – 2: 34.6%; and D – 1: 29.0%. The black dot shows the position of the Morava catchment.

Fig. 10 Component scores of the first principal component PC1 calculated using PCA for 26 summer floods on the River Morava at Kroměříž in the days D – 2 to D – 1 for the period 1881–2003 (L: low; H: high). Explained variance of the SLP field: D – 2: 36.7%; and D – 1: 35.6%. The black dot shows the position of the River Morava catchment.

Fig. 10 Component scores of the first principal component PC1 calculated using PCA for 26 summer floods on the River Morava at Kroměříž in the days D – 2 to D – 1 for the period 1881–2003 (L: low; H: high). Explained variance of the SLP field: D – 2: 36.7%; and D – 1: 35.6%. The black dot shows the position of the River Morava catchment.

Fig. 11 Temperature and precipitation fluctuations over the past 318 years: (a) annual Central European temperatures, 1691–2008; (b) annual Brno temperatures, 1799–2008; (c) summer Brno precipitation totals, 1691–2008; and (d) annual Brno precipitation totals, 1803–2008. Values are expressed as deviations from the corresponding 1961–1990 means and smoothed by Gaussian filter over 30 years.

Fig. 11 Temperature and precipitation fluctuations over the past 318 years: (a) annual Central European temperatures, 1691–2008; (b) annual Brno temperatures, 1799–2008; (c) summer Brno precipitation totals, 1691–2008; and (d) annual Brno precipitation totals, 1803–2008. Values are expressed as deviations from the corresponding 1961–1990 means and smoothed by Gaussian filter over 30 years.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.