Figures & data
Fig. 2 Results of statistical experiment with u′ following unimodal distribution in each sub-season.
![Fig. 2 Results of statistical experiment with u′ following unimodal distribution in each sub-season.](/cms/asset/9803e284-26b9-4d59-b7dc-3257d343e814/thsj_a_743661_o_f0002g.jpg)
Table 1 RMSE values of the statistical experiment based on the AR(1) model with a constant u t
Fig. 3 Distribution of flood peak in (a) Geheyan Reservoir basin and (b) Baishan Reservoir basin. Solid circles represent the IDS-Ι method and triangles represent the IDS-II method.
![Fig. 3 Distribution of flood peak in (a) Geheyan Reservoir basin and (b) Baishan Reservoir basin. Solid circles represent the IDS-Ι method and triangles represent the IDS-II method.](/cms/asset/7ef195aa-8de4-4858-bde2-19417f5c1559/thsj_a_743661_o_f0003g.gif)
Table 2 Results of IDS method for the Geheyan Reservoir basin
Table 3 Results of IDS method for the Baishan Reservoir basin
Table 4 Comparisons of the two versions of the IDS method, IDS-I and IDS-II (AE, the absolute error, is the magnitude of the difference between values of IDS-II and IDS-I, and the relative error is AE divided by the magnitude of the values of IDS-II)
Fig. 5 Values of uk for different flood identification schemes in: (a) Geheyan and (b) Baishan reservoir basins.
![Fig. 5 Values of uk for different flood identification schemes in: (a) Geheyan and (b) Baishan reservoir basins.](/cms/asset/42fb4665-c954-4daa-92d7-526179fba88d/thsj_a_743661_o_f0005g.jpg)