1,724
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Flood modelling in a high country mountain catchment, New Zealand: comparing statistical and deterministic model estimates for ecological flows

Modélisation des crues dans un bassin versant de haute montagne, en Nouvelle-Zélande: comparaison des estimations de débits écologiques issues de modèles statistiques et déterministes

, , &
Pages 328-341 | Received 07 Oct 2011, Accepted 01 Jun 2012, Published online: 11 Feb 2013

Figures & data

Table 1 Summary flow statistics for the Upper Ahuriri River at South Diadem gauge (period of record 1963–2009)

Fig. 1 Location map of (a) the Upper Waitaki River Basin major hydrological features and (b) HEC-GeoHMS catchment map showing the extent of the Ahuriri River, major tributaries, and 31 sub-basins used in the HEC-HMS model.

Fig. 1 Location map of (a) the Upper Waitaki River Basin major hydrological features and (b) HEC-GeoHMS catchment map showing the extent of the Ahuriri River, major tributaries, and 31 sub-basins used in the HEC-HMS model.

Fig. 2 Schematic flow chart for runoff curve number mapping for input to HEC-HMS.

Fig. 2 Schematic flow chart for runoff curve number mapping for input to HEC-HMS.

Fig. 3 Calibration storm (14–18 May 2009) used for the Ahuriri River catchment HEC-HMS model.

Fig. 3 Calibration storm (14–18 May 2009) used for the Ahuriri River catchment HEC-HMS model.

Fig. 4 Mean monthly flows for the Ahuriri River at the South Diadem gauge (1963–2009).

Fig. 4 Mean monthly flows for the Ahuriri River at the South Diadem gauge (1963–2009).

Table 2 Parameters for the two best-fitting distributions, flood peak estimates (m3/s), and the average values of the two distributions

Fig. 5 Plot of comparison of estimated flood magnitudes and return periods for the five best fitting probability distributions for the Ahuriri River flood data.

Fig. 5 Plot of comparison of estimated flood magnitudes and return periods for the five best fitting probability distributions for the Ahuriri River flood data.

Fig. 6 HEC-HMS model calibration results showing the Ahuriri River observed and modelled flow for the calibration event.

Fig. 6 HEC-HMS model calibration results showing the Ahuriri River observed and modelled flow for the calibration event.

Table 3 Summary of comparison of HEC-HMS model results to statistical and other estimates for all flood peaks evaluated in this study (m3/s). PEPF (Per cent Error in Peak Flow) compares HEC-HMS peak to statistical mean peak. ARI is annual recurrence interval (years) and AEP is annual exceedence probability

Fig. 7 HEC-HMS model validation results showing the Ahuriri River observed and modelled flow.

Fig. 7 HEC-HMS model validation results showing the Ahuriri River observed and modelled flow.

Fig. 8 Comparison of the Gringorton plotting position of observed Ahuriri River flood data, GEV and lognormal statistical probability distributions mean, calibrated HEC-HMS model results based on the best curve numbers (CN), model results with both +5% CN and –5% CN, and results from Pearson (Citation1995) based on regional L-moments and quantiles.

Fig. 8 Comparison of the Gringorton plotting position of observed Ahuriri River flood data, GEV and lognormal statistical probability distributions mean, calibrated HEC-HMS model results based on the best curve numbers (CN), model results with both +5% CN and –5% CN, and results from Pearson (Citation1995) based on regional L-moments and quantiles.

Table 4 Sensitivity analysis results of per cent change in curve numbers with resulting proportion change in modelled flood peaks. ARI is annual recurrence interval and AEP is annual exceedence probability

Fig. 9 Results of the curve number sensitivity analysis showing the significant increase in flows observed as the curve number increased.

Fig. 9 Results of the curve number sensitivity analysis showing the significant increase in flows observed as the curve number increased.

Table 5 Comparison of Ahuriri River flood information with other selected nearby rivers with similar drainage areas. Data for all other rivers derived from WRENZ estimates. Rivers drain the east slope of the Southern Alps from north to south with the exception of the Landsborough River above the Clark River on the West Coast and the Orari River at the gorge in the eastern foothills, for comparison purposes

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.