Figures & data
Table 1. Number of iterations and ranges of NSE for monthly percentiles.
Table 2. Key model parameter ranges and number of iterations.
Table 3. Model performance for the calibration and validation stages of the five catchments studied.
Table 4. Results of daily GLUE prediction bounds for all the studied catchments (See the Appendix for description of the parameters).
Table 5. Results of monthly GLUE prediction bounds for all the studied catchments.
Table 6. Results of seasonal GLUE prediction bounds for all the studied catchments.
Table 7. Results of annual GLUE prediction bounds for all the studied catchments.
Figure 3. Model output uncertainty boundaries (5th and 95th percentiles) when performing the GLUE analysis on model calibration (2000–2004) and validation (1961–2012) periods for the Ebbw catchment river flow (monthly values).
![Figure 3. Model output uncertainty boundaries (5th and 95th percentiles) when performing the GLUE analysis on model calibration (2000–2004) and validation (1961–2012) periods for the Ebbw catchment river flow (monthly values).](/cms/asset/ddbfda52-8f59-4c06-8db1-5b0d933b3bbf/thsj_a_1764961_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Model output uncertainty boundaries (5th and 95th percentiles) when performing the GLUE analysis on model calibration (2001–2012) and validation (1967–2012) periods for the Don catchment river flow (seasonal values).
![Figure 4. Model output uncertainty boundaries (5th and 95th percentiles) when performing the GLUE analysis on model calibration (2001–2012) and validation (1967–2012) periods for the Don catchment river flow (seasonal values).](/cms/asset/80c17472-0ba8-460b-9781-c6551bda67ff/thsj_a_1764961_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Model output uncertainty boundaries (5th and 95th percentiles) when performing the GLUE analysis on model calibration (2001–2012) and validation (1971–2000) periods for the Frome catchment using annual observed and simulated data.
![Figure 5. Model output uncertainty boundaries (5th and 95th percentiles) when performing the GLUE analysis on model calibration (2001–2012) and validation (1971–2000) periods for the Frome catchment using annual observed and simulated data.](/cms/asset/84906fd1-f927-48f9-ba3c-e5839690ac09/thsj_a_1764961_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Uncertainty band of the DiCaSM parameters for the period 1962–2012 for the Don and Ebbw catchments. The solid (red) vertical line represents the average value of the measured river flow for the simulated period.
![Figure 6. Uncertainty band of the DiCaSM parameters for the period 1962–2012 for the Don and Ebbw catchments. The solid (red) vertical line represents the average value of the measured river flow for the simulated period.](/cms/asset/bf90354c-8830-4150-96c0-18599dd66c3b/thsj_a_1764961_f0006_oc.jpg)