Figures & data
Figure 1. The relation between volume of MVPA and mathematics post-test scores for the two intervention groups.
![Figure 1. The relation between volume of MVPA and mathematics post-test scores for the two intervention groups.](/cms/asset/d0db13eb-192c-4869-a919-5299a02aa861/rjsp_a_1756680_f0001_b.gif)
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of children, for the total sample and separately for the control group, aerobic intervention group and cognitively engaging intervention group.
Table 2. Average pre-test and post-test scores (n correct) and standard deviations in reading, mathematics and spelling for the three conditions.
Figure 2. The relation between volume of MVPA and spelling post-test scores for the two intervention groups.
![Figure 2. The relation between volume of MVPA and spelling post-test scores for the two intervention groups.](/cms/asset/d701bed3-58a6-4fea-8206-ef81b1c4fcae/rjsp_a_1756680_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Relation between reading pre-test and reading post-test for the control group and the cognitively engaging intervention group.
![Figure 3. Relation between reading pre-test and reading post-test for the control group and the cognitively engaging intervention group.](/cms/asset/f78ea563-7153-4534-8580-f3b42313eaef/rjsp_a_1756680_f0003_b.gif)
Figure A1. Flow chart with the number of participating classes and children in each stage of the study.
![Figure A1. Flow chart with the number of participating classes and children in each stage of the study.](/cms/asset/f42001e4-661a-4ef1-9e8a-934a2490e8db/rjsp_a_1756680_f0004_b.gif)
Table 1. Session plan for the aerobic intervention program.
Table 2. Session plan for the cognitively engaging intervention program.
Table 100. Average amount of MVPA in the three groups.