4,570
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Sports Performance

Interpreting magnitude of change in strength and conditioning: Effect size selection, threshold values and Bayesian updating

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 2047-2054 | Accepted 21 Sep 2022, Published online: 02 Oct 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. Distribution (percentiles) of study characteristics and overview of outcome domains.

Table 2. Direct calculation of largest and smallest 1%, 2% and 5% of effect sizes across outcome types.

Figure 1. Empirical distribution and modelled outcome-specific standardised mean difference effect size thresholds.

(Below): Black curve is a density plot of the directly calculated empirical effect size values across all outcomes. Small, mid, and large thresholds represent the 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75-quantiles of predicted draws. Black diamonds are based on direct calculation and red intervals illustrate uncertainty in estimates through the median value (circle) and 95% credible interval.
Figure 1. Empirical distribution and modelled outcome-specific standardised mean difference effect size thresholds.

Figure 2. Empirical distribution and modelled outcome-specific percentage improvement effect size thresholds.

(Below): Black curve is a density plot of the directly calculated empirical effect size values across all outcomes. Small, mid, and large thresholds represent the 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75-quantiles of predicted draws. Black diamonds are based on direct calculation and red intervals illustrate uncertainty in estimates through the median value (circle) and 95% credible interval.
Figure 2. Empirical distribution and modelled outcome-specific percentage improvement effect size thresholds.

Table 3. Mean and standard deviations of prior distributions for standardised mean difference (SMDpre) and log transformed relative ratio (RR) effect sizes statistics across outcome domains.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (82.5 KB)