530
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

The effects of power on–off durations of pulsed ultrasound on the destruction of cancer cells

, , , , , & show all
Pages 371-380 | Received 23 Mar 2006, Accepted 13 Mar 2007, Published online: 09 Jul 2009

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental setup. HeLa cells were seeded at a concentration of 3.5 × 104 cells/well in the six wells of a 24-well plate shown in gray.

Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental setup. HeLa cells were seeded at a concentration of 3.5 × 104 cells/well in the six wells of a 24-well plate shown in gray.

Table I.  Parameters for experiments involving a fixed duty cycle of 50% with variable on- and off-times.

Table II.  Parameters for experiments involving a fixed off-time (25 ms) with variable on-times.

Table III.  Parameters for experiments involving a fixed on-time with variable off-times.

Figure 2. Effect of the PRF (fixed duty cycle with variable on-/off-times) on the percentage of viable cultured HeLa cells. Significant cell destruction compared with controls (p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test) is evident for PRFs between 2 and 2000 Hz. The temperature did not differ significantly among the groups for PRF equal to 2000 and 4000 Hz (#, p > 0.05, two-tailed t-test), but significantly difference in cell survival was found between them (*, p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test).

Figure 2. Effect of the PRF (fixed duty cycle with variable on-/off-times) on the percentage of viable cultured HeLa cells. Significant cell destruction compared with controls (p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test) is evident for PRFs between 2 and 2000 Hz. The temperature did not differ significantly among the groups for PRF equal to 2000 and 4000 Hz (#, p > 0.05, two-tailed t-test), but significantly difference in cell survival was found between them (*, p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test).

Figure 3. Effect of the on-time (and variable off-times) on the percentage of viable HeLa cells. Significant cell destruction compared with controls (p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test) is evident for on-times of 5, 25 and 250 ms. No significant cell destruction is evident for on-time of 0.5 and 2.5 ms. However, the temperature decreased with the on-time. Significant difference was found in cell destruction (*) between on-times of 5 and 2.5, but not in temperature elevation (#).

Figure 3. Effect of the on-time (and variable off-times) on the percentage of viable HeLa cells. Significant cell destruction compared with controls (p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test) is evident for on-times of 5, 25 and 250 ms. No significant cell destruction is evident for on-time of 0.5 and 2.5 ms. However, the temperature decreased with the on-time. Significant difference was found in cell destruction (*) between on-times of 5 and 2.5, but not in temperature elevation (#).

Figure 4. Effect of the off-times (pairs of a fixed on-time with an off-time that was either the same or 10 times longer) on the percentage of viable HeLa cells at 28 h after sonication. Significant cell destruction but with a temperature increase of less than 1.5°C compared with controls (p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test) is evident for on/-off-times of 25/250 and 250/2500 ms/ms were found.

Figure 4. Effect of the off-times (pairs of a fixed on-time with an off-time that was either the same or 10 times longer) on the percentage of viable HeLa cells at 28 h after sonication. Significant cell destruction but with a temperature increase of less than 1.5°C compared with controls (p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test) is evident for on/-off-times of 25/250 and 250/2500 ms/ms were found.

Figure 5. Effect of the fixed on-times but varied off-times on the survival ratio of different types of cultured cells at 4 h after sonication. * The survival ratio is significantly different from controls (p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test). Control: cells without ultrasound exposure. Each column represents the average of three trials of the combined result from nine samples per trial.

Figure 5. Effect of the fixed on-times but varied off-times on the survival ratio of different types of cultured cells at 4 h after sonication. * The survival ratio is significantly different from controls (p < 0.05, two-tailed t-test). Control: cells without ultrasound exposure. Each column represents the average of three trials of the combined result from nine samples per trial.

Figure 6. Ultrasound induces apoptotic cell death as a function of time, determined by flow cytometer. Hela cell line was sonicated using five paired parameters (on-off ratios of 1 and 0.1, with different on- and off-times). Four (a) and 28 (b) hours after the ultrasound exposure, the relative percentage of cell apoptosis, including both early apoptosis and secondary necrotic cells, were determined using the FITC-labeled annexin V kit. * : p < 0.05 (n = 3).

Figure 6. Ultrasound induces apoptotic cell death as a function of time, determined by flow cytometer. Hela cell line was sonicated using five paired parameters (on-off ratios of 1 and 0.1, with different on- and off-times). Four (a) and 28 (b) hours after the ultrasound exposure, the relative percentage of cell apoptosis, including both early apoptosis and secondary necrotic cells, were determined using the FITC-labeled annexin V kit. * : p < 0.05 (n = 3).

Figure 7. The correlation between the maximal temperature elevation and the percentage of surviving cells relative to controls.

Figure 7. The correlation between the maximal temperature elevation and the percentage of surviving cells relative to controls.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.