Figures & data
Figure 1. Schematics of experimental setup for millifluidic release assay. A TSL solution (TSL + buffer) is pumped through a capillary tube. The tube is heated to the desired temperature by a temperature controlled Peltier element. Once the TSL solution enters the heated region, TSL release the fluorescent drug/dye, resulting in a fluorescence gradient along the tube (upper graph). The Peltier temperature is measured by a thermocouple and a control algorithm regulates the power applied to the Peltier element to control temperature.
![Figure 1. Schematics of experimental setup for millifluidic release assay. A TSL solution (TSL + buffer) is pumped through a capillary tube. The tube is heated to the desired temperature by a temperature controlled Peltier element. Once the TSL solution enters the heated region, TSL release the fluorescent drug/dye, resulting in a fluorescence gradient along the tube (upper graph). The Peltier temperature is measured by a thermocouple and a control algorithm regulates the power applied to the Peltier element to control temperature.](/cms/asset/c7c7c6f8-7646-479f-9874-cd24389358d0/ihyt_a_1412504_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Calibration plot for converting SRB fluorescence intensity to temperature (A). Unencapsulated dye was pumped through the capillary tube which was heated to 43 °C. Temperature along the tube distance was calculated based on the calibration plot (B). Fluid entering the capillary tube reached the target temperature within ∼3 mm, corresponding to ∼0.3 s (flow velocity =10 mm/s). Fluorescence image of SRB pumped through the tube at 2.5 mm/s @ 16 ms exposure time, demonstrating no detectable variation in arrival time across the tube diameter (C).
![Figure 2. Calibration plot for converting SRB fluorescence intensity to temperature (A). Unencapsulated dye was pumped through the capillary tube which was heated to 43 °C. Temperature along the tube distance was calculated based on the calibration plot (B). Fluid entering the capillary tube reached the target temperature within ∼3 mm, corresponding to ∼0.3 s (flow velocity =10 mm/s). Fluorescence image of SRB pumped through the tube at 2.5 mm/s @ 16 ms exposure time, demonstrating no detectable variation in arrival time across the tube diameter (C).](/cms/asset/c7c893bf-5910-4d70-9f7e-2eafde1823b1/ihyt_a_1412504_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Release of CF from TSL along tube distance, for three different flow velocities (A). Percent release vs. time is independent of flow velocity (B). A sample microscope image demonstrating the fluorescence gradient along the tube resulting from TSL releasing CF (C).
![Figure 3. Release of CF from TSL along tube distance, for three different flow velocities (A). Percent release vs. time is independent of flow velocity (B). A sample microscope image demonstrating the fluorescence gradient along the tube resulting from TSL releasing CF (C).](/cms/asset/dd30554f-13db-4fcf-bf4c-6efeff7bcf39/ihyt_a_1412504_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Release of CF from MSPC-LTSL at 42 °C. Percent CF release over 30 s is plotted comparing the traditional cuvette method – whereby a single data point is acquired every 8 s – to the novel millifluidic method whereby release data is acquired continuously. Data plots represent the mean of three experiments.
![Figure 4. Release of CF from MSPC-LTSL at 42 °C. Percent CF release over 30 s is plotted comparing the traditional cuvette method – whereby a single data point is acquired every 8 s – to the novel millifluidic method whereby release data is acquired continuously. Data plots represent the mean of three experiments.](/cms/asset/15aaf7db-eea2-45c2-8abe-c67a04278acb/ihyt_a_1412504_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Release of four compounds from MSPC-LTSL at 37 and 42 °C was measured with the traditional cuvette method over 10 min (A) and with our millifluidic device over 6 s (B).
![Figure 5. Release of four compounds from MSPC-LTSL at 37 and 42 °C was measured with the traditional cuvette method over 10 min (A) and with our millifluidic device over 6 s (B).](/cms/asset/dd5084a7-7c8f-4ef9-8bd1-7285f8038749/ihyt_a_1412504_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Release of carboxyfluorescein from MSPC-LTSL at various temperatures in different buffers: PBS, 10% BSA solution, FBS or human plasma.
![Figure 6. Release of carboxyfluorescein from MSPC-LTSL at various temperatures in different buffers: PBS, 10% BSA solution, FBS or human plasma.](/cms/asset/686209fa-17fb-4df1-89b6-ef301bba30d9/ihyt_a_1412504_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7. Release of CF from MSPC-LTSL at 42 °C in different buffers: PBS, 10% BSA solution, FBS or human plasma. Results are shown for measurements using the traditional cuvette method over 10 min (A) and using the millifluidic method over 6 s (B).
![Figure 7. Release of CF from MSPC-LTSL at 42 °C in different buffers: PBS, 10% BSA solution, FBS or human plasma. Results are shown for measurements using the traditional cuvette method over 10 min (A) and using the millifluidic method over 6 s (B).](/cms/asset/2b8dc108-106e-4c95-b4b3-0de6916808f4/ihyt_a_1412504_f0007_c.jpg)
Table 1. Release of carboxyfluorescein from MSPC-LTSL at various temperatures in different buffers (data from ) was fitted to an exponential model. Fitted parameter values are reported in the table. Fitting was not performed for any data at 37 °C or for BSA/PBS at 39 °C, due to inadequate fit (R^2 < 0.3). Fitting was performed based on mean of data in .