2,150
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Prognosis of microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: does age make a difference?

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 688-695 | Received 03 Apr 2020, Accepted 31 May 2020, Published online: 19 Jun 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Comparison of included and excluded characteristics.

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of groups 1–4 and pairwise comparison between groups 1–3 and group 4.

Table 3. Prognostic outcomes for groups 1–4.

Figure 1. The cumulative overall survival of group 1 (<55 years), group 2 (55–64 years), group 3 (65–74 years), and group 4 (≥75 years). The log rank test showed a significant difference among the 4 groups (p < 0.001). Pairwise statistical difference existed between group 1, 2 and 4 (p = 0.002, 0.013).

Figure 1. The cumulative overall survival of group 1 (<55 years), group 2 (55–64 years), group 3 (65–74 years), and group 4 (≥75 years). The log rank test showed a significant difference among the 4 groups (p < 0.001). Pairwise statistical difference existed between group 1, 2 and 4 (p = 0.002, 0.013).

Table 4. Baseline characteristics of Group Y (<75 years) and Group S (≥75 years).

Table 5. Prognostic outcomes before and after matching.

Figure 2. The cumulative overall survival of Group Y (<75 years) and Group S (≥75 years) after propensity matching. The log rank test showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.784).

Figure 2. The cumulative overall survival of Group Y (<75 years) and Group S (≥75 years) after propensity matching. The log rank test showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.784).

Table 6. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival of the patients from Group Y and S.