2,194
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The guiding value of microvascular invasion for treating early recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma

, , , ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 931-938 | Received 19 Apr 2021, Accepted 14 May 2021, Published online: 13 Jun 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. The flowchart of patient enrollment.

Figure 1. The flowchart of patient enrollment.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of recurrent HCC patients receiving different treatments.

Figure 2. The survival curves of recurrent HCC patients receiving hepatectomy, RFA or TACE-RFA. No significant difference was found in sRFS (A) or PRS (B) among the different treatment groups.

Figure 2. The survival curves of recurrent HCC patients receiving hepatectomy, RFA or TACE-RFA. No significant difference was found in sRFS (A) or PRS (B) among the different treatment groups.

Figure 3. The survival curves of recurrent HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy, RFA or TACE-RFA in groups classified by MVI statuses. (A) sRFS and (B) PRS for the MVI (−) group. (C) sRFS and (D) PRS for the MVI (+) group.

Figure 3. The survival curves of recurrent HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy, RFA or TACE-RFA in groups classified by MVI statuses. (A) sRFS and (B) PRS for the MVI (−) group. (C) sRFS and (D) PRS for the MVI (+) group.

Figure 4. Subgroup analyses of sRFS and PRS for recurrent HCC patients receiving hepatectomy, RFA or TACE-RFA based on MVI status and TTR.

Figure 4. Subgroup analyses of sRFS and PRS for recurrent HCC patients receiving hepatectomy, RFA or TACE-RFA based on MVI status and TTR.

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for post-recurrence survival (PRS) and secondary recurrence-free survival (sRFS).

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (185.9 KB)

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (97.2 KB)