1,885
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A feasibility study of microwave ablation for papillary thyroid cancer close to the thyroid capsule

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1217-1224 | Received 26 Apr 2021, Accepted 26 Jul 2021, Published online: 12 Aug 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. (A) Measurement of distance between PTC tumor to thyroid capsule 348 (double headed arrow); (B) PTC tumor abutted to thyroid capsule without CI.

Figure 1. (A) Measurement of distance between PTC tumor to thyroid capsule 348 (double headed arrow); (B) PTC tumor abutted to thyroid capsule without CI.

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for study designs.

Figure 2. Flow chart of patient selection.

Figure 2. Flow chart of patient selection.

Table 2. Demographic characteristics of enrolled and excluded cases in this study.

Table 3. Demographic characteristics of patients with PTC close to capsule included in this study (n = 106).

Figure 3. A 33-year-old woman with papillary thyroid cancer close to the capsule was treated with microwave ablation (MWA). (A) pre-MWA, ultrasound (US) showed a hypoechoic target tumor (arrows); (B) before MWA, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) showed a hypo-enhancement pattern in the artery phase (arrows); (C) the hydrodissection technique (triangles) was used to protect the trachea surrounding the tumor (arrows); (D) US showed a hyperechoic pattern in the tumor (arrows) during ablation; (E) post-MWA, CEUS showed no enhancement (arrows) in the tumor area; and (F) on 1 month post-MWA, US showed a hypoechoic ablation zone (arrows).

Figure 3. A 33-year-old woman with papillary thyroid cancer close to the capsule was treated with microwave ablation (MWA). (A) pre-MWA, ultrasound (US) showed a hypoechoic target tumor (arrows); (B) before MWA, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) showed a hypo-enhancement pattern in the artery phase (arrows); (C) the hydrodissection technique (triangles) was used to protect the trachea surrounding the tumor (arrows); (D) US showed a hyperechoic pattern in the tumor (arrows) during ablation; (E) post-MWA, CEUS showed no enhancement (arrows) in the tumor area; and (F) on 1 month post-MWA, US showed a hypoechoic ablation zone (arrows).

Figure 4. Changes in mean volume at each follow-up time point.

Figure 4. Changes in mean volume at each follow-up time point.

Figure 5. Changes in VRR at each follow-up time point.

Figure 5. Changes in VRR at each follow-up time point.

Table 4. Indicators of thyroid function before MWA and after MWA.

Table 5. Tumor size (maximum diameter and volume) before MWA and at each follow-up time-point after MWA.

Data availability statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.