1,481
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effect of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy on ovarian reserve

, , ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1409-1414 | Received 25 Jul 2021, Accepted 06 Sep 2021, Published online: 21 Sep 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flow diagram of enrolled patients. CSP, cesarean scar pregnancy; HIFU, high-intensity focused ultrasound; UAE, uterine artery embolization; MTX, Methotrexate; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of enrolled patients. CSP, cesarean scar pregnancy; HIFU, high-intensity focused ultrasound; UAE, uterine artery embolization; MTX, Methotrexate; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.

Figure 2. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound images before and after HIFU ablation (sagittal). (A) The gestational sac (blue arrow) and blood flow (red arrow) were presented on transabdominal color Doppler contrast-enhanced ultrasound before HIFU ablation. (B) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound showed the gestational sac was deformed (blue arrow) and blood perfusion was significantly reduced (red arrow) after HIFU ablation.

Figure 2. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound images before and after HIFU ablation (sagittal). (A) The gestational sac (blue arrow) and blood flow (red arrow) were presented on transabdominal color Doppler contrast-enhanced ultrasound before HIFU ablation. (B) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound showed the gestational sac was deformed (blue arrow) and blood perfusion was significantly reduced (red arrow) after HIFU ablation.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study population.

Table 2. Treatment results of the study population (n = 32).

Figure 3. AMH levels after HIFU treatment for CSP. AMH levels (ng/ml) before and at 3 months after HIFU were not significantly different by paired t-test (P-value = .680).

Figure 3. AMH levels after HIFU treatment for CSP. AMH levels (ng/ml) before and at 3 months after HIFU were not significantly different by paired t-test (P-value = .680).