556
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Predictive nomograms of repeat intrahepatic recurrence and overall survival after radiofrequency ablation of recurrent colorectal liver metastases

, , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2323152 | Received 18 Sep 2023, Accepted 21 Feb 2024, Published online: 11 Mar 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Patient inclusion flowchart.

Figure 1. Patient inclusion flowchart.

Table 1. Characteristics of the patients.

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for rIHR and OS after RFA.

Figure 2. Nomograms for predicting 1- and 2-year rIHR rates after RFA for patients with recurrent CLMs. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; CLM, colorectal liver metastases; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; rIHR, repeat intrahepatic recurrence.

Figure 2. Nomograms for predicting 1- and 2-year rIHR rates after RFA for patients with recurrent CLMs. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; CLM, colorectal liver metastases; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; rIHR, repeat intrahepatic recurrence.

Figure 3. Nomograms for predicting 3- and 5-year OS rates after RFA for patients with recurrent CLMs. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; CLM, colorectal liver metastases; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; OS, overall survival.

Figure 3. Nomograms for predicting 3- and 5-year OS rates after RFA for patients with recurrent CLMs. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; CLM, colorectal liver metastases; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; OS, overall survival.

Figure 4. Calibration curves for rIHR after RFA based on nomogram prediction and actual observation. (A–B) 1- and 2-year rIHR rates in the training cohorts. (C–D) 1- and 2-year rIHR rates in the validation cohorts. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; rIHR, repeat intrahepatic recurrence; OS, overall survival.

Figure 4. Calibration curves for rIHR after RFA based on nomogram prediction and actual observation. (A–B) 1- and 2-year rIHR rates in the training cohorts. (C–D) 1- and 2-year rIHR rates in the validation cohorts. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; rIHR, repeat intrahepatic recurrence; OS, overall survival.

Figure 5. Calibration curves for OS after RFA based on nomogram prediction and actual observation. (A–B). 3- and 5-year OS rates in the training cohorts. (C–D) 3- and 5-year OS rates in the validation cohorts. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; OS, overall survival.

Figure 5. Calibration curves for OS after RFA based on nomogram prediction and actual observation. (A–B). 3- and 5-year OS rates in the training cohorts. (C–D) 3- and 5-year OS rates in the validation cohorts. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; OS, overall survival.

Figure 6. The risk score was closely related to the prognosis of recurrent CLM patients treated with RFA. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves of OS. (B) CIF curves of rIHR. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; CLM, colorectal liver metastases; rIHR, repeat intrahepatic recurrence; OS, overall survival; CIF, cumulative incidence function.

Figure 6. The risk score was closely related to the prognosis of recurrent CLM patients treated with RFA. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves of OS. (B) CIF curves of rIHR. RFA, radiofrequency ablation; CLM, colorectal liver metastases; rIHR, repeat intrahepatic recurrence; OS, overall survival; CIF, cumulative incidence function.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (31.3 KB)

Data availability statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.