779
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

On the reliability of vocational workplace-based certifications

&
Pages 75-90 | Published online: 02 Jan 2013
 

Abstract

The assessment of vocational workplace-based qualifications in England relies on human assessors (raters). These assessors observe naturally occurring, non-standardised evidence, unique to each learner and evaluate the learner as competent/not yet competent against content standards. Whilst these are considered difficult to measure, this study aims to provide information on the operational reliability of assessor decisions for three workplace-based vocational qualifications in Hairdressing and Electrotechnical Engineering. It is shown how existing assessment records, typically generated locally by the training providers, were collected and used in a reliability study. A suitable methodology for estimating the inter-rater reliability and internal consistency was then used with this empirical data. In general, the reliability estimates measured may be considered high. This research study shows that it may be possible to measure reliability for these qualifications using commonly used measurement methods, although several characteristics of the assessment system should be considered in their interpretation.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their thanks to Professors Paul Black and Jo-Anne Baird and the three anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments on previous drafts of this paper and Inga Fitzgerald and Andrew Boyle for advice throughout this project. This work was carried out by City & Guilds, an English awarding body, using their own qualifications. The study was funded by Ofqual [The Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation in England] as part of the Reliability of Results Programme.

Notes

1. This study was carried out during a period of transition to a new national credit transfer system for qualifications in England, from the National Qualifications Framework (NQF) to the Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF). Under the QCF, the unit templates included assessment criteria, which specify the required level of performance a candidate must demonstrate to achieve a learning outcome.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 538.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.