Figures & data
Table 1. Examples of the syllogisms displayed to the participants in the present study according to their structure (no conflict and conflict) for each type of content (control, adolescent-related and adult-related content) translated in English.
Figure 1. Average risk perception scale.
![Figure 1. Average risk perception scale.](/cms/asset/ec6f350d-9662-4652-be5c-3b38b8d45007/rady_a_2242469_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Mean agreement with statements relating to risk-taking behaviours in the absence or presence of peers.
![Figure 2. Mean agreement with statements relating to risk-taking behaviours in the absence or presence of peers.](/cms/asset/39b9d394-00f5-411e-be54-3e138572b799/rady_a_2242469_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Mean belief bias index (and standard deviations) for each type of syllogism content (control, adolescence-related, and adulthood-related) and for each age group (adolescents and adults).
![Figure 3. Mean belief bias index (and standard deviations) for each type of syllogism content (control, adolescence-related, and adulthood-related) and for each age group (adolescents and adults).](/cms/asset/ac8e3ede-13d5-4745-a08c-b5fba458b7c0/rady_a_2242469_f0003_oc.jpg)
Supplemental Material
Download MS Word (28.5 KB)Data availability statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article or its supplementary materials.