Figures & data
Figure 1. Average profile of an “ideal” mindchanger (a) and young respondents’ self-perceptions (b).
![Figure 1. Average profile of an “ideal” mindchanger (a) and young respondents’ self-perceptions (b).](/cms/asset/82d587f4-6ae5-4c31-85c4-f7a955648878/rady_a_2281415_f0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Characteristics of the ‘ideal’ mindchanger with statistically significant differences in the likelihood to become a mindchanger (Kruskal-Wallis test results).
Figure 2. Profile of respondents in their likelihood to become a mindchanger versus the “ideal” profile of a mindchanger.
![Figure 2. Profile of respondents in their likelihood to become a mindchanger versus the “ideal” profile of a mindchanger.](/cms/asset/06164362-5a3a-4e1a-ad83-0cda66e41628/rady_a_2281415_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Characteristics of the young respondents with statistically significant differences in the likelihood to become a mindchanger (Kruskal-Wallis test results).
Figure 3. Mean score and 95% confidence interval (CI) for characteristics with statistically significant differences by gender (a) and place of residence (b).
![Figure 3. Mean score and 95% confidence interval (CI) for characteristics with statistically significant differences by gender (a) and place of residence (b).](/cms/asset/c249f192-2e57-4fe8-8f9f-299bba0a4cd3/rady_a_2281415_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 3. Characteristics of the young respondents with statistically significant differences by gender (Mann-whitney U test) and place of residence (Kruskal-Wallis test).