Figures & data
Figure 1. Decision tree for medical management versus decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension
![Figure 1. Decision tree for medical management versus decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension](/cms/asset/752c179b-dca9-45af-82bf-063ba0d1184f/ibij_a_1878556_f0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Probabilities associated with terminal nodes of the surgical arm and medical arm of the Markov model
Table 2. QALYs derived from GOS-E scores
Table 3. The expected costs and QALYs gained from the two therapeutic branches over the 1-year time horizon
Table 4. The ICER, NHB and NMB of both the original model and sensitivity analyses
Figure 2. The redesigned Markov model, in which GOS-E outcomes have been categorized into either ‘favorable’ or ‘unfavorable’
![Figure 2. The redesigned Markov model, in which GOS-E outcomes have been categorized into either ‘favorable’ or ‘unfavorable’](/cms/asset/8250660f-77c5-46cc-a1c0-7e99d5379331/ibij_a_1878556_f0002_oc.jpg)
Supplemental Material
Download MS Word (131.1 KB)Data availability statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.