Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics Volume 36, 2022 - Issue 2-3: Conference papers from the 18th conference of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association in Glasgow, 2021 (Part 1: Speech); Guest editors: Anja Kuschmann, Joanne Cleland & Eleanor Sugden
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,270
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

How expertise and language familiarity influence perception of speech of people with Parkinson’s disease

V. Verkhodanovaa Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands;b Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5481-8508View further author information
ORCID Icon,
M. Colera Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen, Leeuwarden, The NetherlandsView further author information
,
R. Jonkersb Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;c The Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsView further author information
&
W. Lowieb Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;c The Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsView further author information
Pages 165-182 | Received 29 Oct 2020, Accepted 02 Nov 2021, Published online: 22 Nov 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Speaker demographics. Age and duration of disease are given in years

Table 2. Participants demographics. Age is given in years

Figure 1. IDK answers distribution by listener group and by type of speech task.

Figure 1. IDK answers distribution by listener group and by type of speech task.

Table 3. The Fleiss’ Kappa interrater agreement for different listener

Figure 2. Accuracy of speech healthiness classification.

Figure 2. Accuracy of speech healthiness classification.

Table 4. Welch’s F test results per task, with and without confidence weight

Figure 3. Accuracy of sentence type classification in HC speech (a) and in PD speech (b) for three listener groups.

Figure 3. Accuracy of sentence type classification in HC speech (a) and in PD speech (b) for three listener groups.

Figure 4. Accuracy of speech healthiness classification for four listener groups.

Figure 4. Accuracy of speech healthiness classification for four listener groups.

Table 5. Welch’s F test results for the analysis of language background effect. Results are presented per task and with and without confidence weight

Figure 5. Accuracy of sentence type classification in HC speech (a) and in PD speech (b) for four listener groups.

Figure 5. Accuracy of sentence type classification in HC speech (a) and in PD speech (b) for four listener groups.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.