6,398
Views
57
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Happiness increases verbal and spatial working memory capacity where sadness does not: Emotion, working memory and executive control

&
Pages 925-938 | Received 05 Jul 2014, Accepted 21 Mar 2015, Published online: 07 May 2015
 

Abstract

The effects of emotion on working memory and executive control are often studied in isolation. Positive mood enhances verbal and impairs spatial working memory, whereas negative mood enhances spatial and impairs verbal working memory. Moreover, positive mood enhances executive control, whereas negative mood has little influence. We examined how emotion influences verbal and spatial working memory capacity, which requires executive control to coordinate between holding information in working memory and completing a secondary task. We predicted that positive mood would improve both verbal and spatial working memory capacity because of its influence on executive control. Positive, negative and neutral moods were induced followed by completing a verbal (Experiment 1) or spatial (Experiment 2) working memory operation span task to assess working memory capacity. Positive mood enhanced working memory capacity irrespective of the working memory domain, whereas negative mood had no influence on performance. Thus, positive mood was more successful holding information in working memory while processing task-irrelevant information, suggesting that the influence mood has on executive control supersedes the independent effects mood has on domain-specific working memory.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 We also performed a weighted partial-credit scoring algorithm following the procedures in Conway et al. (Citation2005), and the results were conceptually replicated [F(2, 117) = 6.93, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.11; Positive vs. Negative, p < .01; Positive vs. Neutral, p = .05; Negative vs. Neutral, p = .40].

2 The same weighted partial-credit scoring algorithm was ran as in Experiment 1 (see footnote 1), and the results were conceptually replicated [F(2, 97) = 4.72, p = .01, η2 = 0.09; Positive vs. Negative, p = .02; Positive vs. Neutral, p = .05; Negative vs. Neutral, p = .97].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.