Figures & data
Figure 2. (a) The time flow of the experiment. For dynamically constricting or dilating pupils, pupils were static for the first 1500 ms, followed by a dynamic constriction or dilation of the pupil that reached the maximum after 1500 ms, and stayed at maximum for another 1000 ms. Static pupils remained the same size in the static condition throughout the trial. (b) Infants’ and parents’ predicted pupil responses (on the right) over the time interval (1600–4000 ms) investigated within stimulus presentation time in Study 1. (c) Infants’ and parents’ predicted pupil responses (on the right) over the time interval (1600–4000 ms) investigated within stimulus presentation time in Study 2.
![Figure 2. (a) The time flow of the experiment. For dynamically constricting or dilating pupils, pupils were static for the first 1500 ms, followed by a dynamic constriction or dilation of the pupil that reached the maximum after 1500 ms, and stayed at maximum for another 1000 ms. Static pupils remained the same size in the static condition throughout the trial. (b) Infants’ and parents’ predicted pupil responses (on the right) over the time interval (1600–4000 ms) investigated within stimulus presentation time in Study 1. (c) Infants’ and parents’ predicted pupil responses (on the right) over the time interval (1600–4000 ms) investigated within stimulus presentation time in Study 2.](/cms/asset/c8e9d9af-82c1-418a-85c6-7ae53b0d7896/pcem_a_1732875_f0002_oc.jpg)
Supplementary_Material
Download MS Word (35.9 KB)Data Availability
The data for the current study are available by request to the corresponding author.