3,263
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Pupil mimicry in infants and parents

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1160-1170 | Received 05 Sep 2018, Accepted 12 Feb 2020, Published online: 02 Mar 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. Experimental set-up.

Figure 1. Experimental set-up.

Figure 2. (a) The time flow of the experiment. For dynamically constricting or dilating pupils, pupils were static for the first 1500 ms, followed by a dynamic constriction or dilation of the pupil that reached the maximum after 1500 ms, and stayed at maximum for another 1000 ms. Static pupils remained the same size in the static condition throughout the trial. (b) Infants’ and parents’ predicted pupil responses (on the right) over the time interval (1600–4000 ms) investigated within stimulus presentation time in Study 1. (c) Infants’ and parents’ predicted pupil responses (on the right) over the time interval (1600–4000 ms) investigated within stimulus presentation time in Study 2.

Figure 2. (a) The time flow of the experiment. For dynamically constricting or dilating pupils, pupils were static for the first 1500 ms, followed by a dynamic constriction or dilation of the pupil that reached the maximum after 1500 ms, and stayed at maximum for another 1000 ms. Static pupils remained the same size in the static condition throughout the trial. (b) Infants’ and parents’ predicted pupil responses (on the right) over the time interval (1600–4000 ms) investigated within stimulus presentation time in Study 1. (c) Infants’ and parents’ predicted pupil responses (on the right) over the time interval (1600–4000 ms) investigated within stimulus presentation time in Study 2.
Supplemental material

Supplementary_Material

Download MS Word (35.9 KB)

Data Availability

The data for the current study are available by request to the corresponding author.