2,188
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Article

Burnout undermines empathising: do induced burnout symptoms impair cognitive and affective empathy?

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 185-192 | Received 13 Jun 2019, Accepted 19 Jul 2020, Published online: 13 Aug 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Empathy is crucial for the quality of social interactions and thus highly relevant in human service professions. At the same time, people belonging to this occupational group are especially vulnerable to developing burnout symptoms. With this study, we aimed to investigate the causal link between burnout symptoms and empathy by using a novel experimental design. Our participants (N = 355; 44.5% women; Mage = 36.37) filled out an online questionnaire; in an autobiographical memory task, the experimental group retrieved previous burnout experiences, whereas one control group retrieved a neutral memory and another control group received no intervention. After measuring current burnout symptoms as a manipulation check, we measured the cognitive and affective empathy of all participants. Findings indicate that the experimental group reported significantly higher burnout symptoms compared to control groups, validating our intervention method. Furthermore, we found that the experimental group scored lower on one of the cognitive empathy measures, suggesting negative effects on the relational skills of burned-out individuals. Results are discussed with regard to ecological validity and implications.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 We chose a small effect size and a conservative power level due to the artificial nature and novelty of the experimental design.

2 Participants were excluded if they did not respond to the question presented during the intervention, but wrote about something else (n = 7), or if they wrote essays with a particularly positive connotation in the experimental group (n = 4) or with a clear negative connotation in the control group 1 (n = 2). Further, we excluded one participant who provided two completely different essays in the manipulation task and in the refreshment task (completed between the two cognitive empathy tests), suggesting two different persons filling out the same questionnaire.

3 Copyright ©1981 Christina Maslach & Susan E. Jackson. All rights reserved in all media. Published by Mind Garden, Inc., www.mindgarden.com

4 One item of the STEU had to be deleted due to incorrect orthography and, therefore, possible misunderstanding.

5 Congruently to the STEU, one item had to be deleted due to incorrect orthography and, therefore, possible misunderstanding. Another item contained two incongruent names; however, we did not remove the item because the content was not affected and descriptive values did not differ from the other items.

6 In our preregistration, we stated we would conduct multivariate analysis of variance with all three empathy measures as dependent variables. However, because affective empathy scores did not correlate with the two cognitive empathy measures, we conducted independent t-tests instead.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.