Figures & data
Figure 1. Stimuli as presented in the three different pro- and antisaccade paradigms applying classic circles (A), emotional faces (B) and scrambled faces (C) as target cues.
![Figure 1. Stimuli as presented in the three different pro- and antisaccade paradigms applying classic circles (A), emotional faces (B) and scrambled faces (C) as target cues.](/cms/asset/22576e3a-d335-42c1-862a-696d9c628844/pcem_a_1979475_f0001_ob.jpg)
Figure 2. RTs and ERs across different paradigms (A, B) and emotions within the emotional antisaccade task (C, D).
![Figure 2. RTs and ERs across different paradigms (A, B) and emotions within the emotional antisaccade task (C, D).](/cms/asset/a2d75a6e-6e9c-4e61-8954-6936ba44c783/pcem_a_1979475_f0002_ob.jpg)
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of antisaccade paradigms and for different emotions.