1,401
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Conjunctiva and Eye-Lids

Bulbar Conjunctival Microvascular Alterations in Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy Patients with Different Activities

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 943-948 | Received 27 Mar 2020, Accepted 06 Nov 2020, Published online: 15 Mar 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. (a) Images of paranasal bulbar conjunctival microvascular network with 16× magnification. (b) One of the six regions of view of 1.20 × 0.90 mm2 to capture the movements of red blood cell clusters. (c) The fractal analysis, including D0 and Dbox, was obtained in the blue area, approximately 15.24 × 10.16 mm2

Figure 1. (a) Images of paranasal bulbar conjunctival microvascular network with 16× magnification. (b) One of the six regions of view of 1.20 × 0.90 mm2 to capture the movements of red blood cell clusters. (c) The fractal analysis, including D0 and Dbox, was obtained in the blue area, approximately 15.24 × 10.16 mm2

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of all enrolled subjects

Table 2. Microvascular parameters in bulbar conjunctivas

Figure 2. Correlations between blood flow velocity and average diameter. The blood flow velocity distribution showed a positive correlation between vessel velocity and diameter in the TAO group (all r > 0.80, P < .001) and healthy control group (r > 0.60, P < .05)

Figure 2. Correlations between blood flow velocity and average diameter. The blood flow velocity distribution showed a positive correlation between vessel velocity and diameter in the TAO group (all r > 0.80, P < .001) and healthy control group (r > 0.60, P < .05)

Table 3. Correlations among bulbar conjunctival parameters and CAS and exophthalmos

Figure 3. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROCs) for differentiating active TAO eyes from inactive TAO eyes of morphologic and hemodynamic microvascular parameters: Dbox (0.800), D0 (0.793), average diameter (0.787), blood flow velocity (0.798) and blood flow rate (0.800)

Figure 3. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROCs) for differentiating active TAO eyes from inactive TAO eyes of morphologic and hemodynamic microvascular parameters: Dbox (0.800), D0 (0.793), average diameter (0.787), blood flow velocity (0.798) and blood flow rate (0.800)

Figure 4. The ROC curve of the predicted value based on the multiple logistic regression analysis of all microvascular parameters in TAO patients. AUROC = 0.793

Figure 4. The ROC curve of the predicted value based on the multiple logistic regression analysis of all microvascular parameters in TAO patients. AUROC = 0.793