Figures & data
Figure 2. (a) Example of rotational stability evaluation performed with Photoshop. The reference axis is drawn by joining two critical details (e.g. Axenfeld-loops, limbal vessels) and the comparison axis is drawn by joining the IOL toric markings. (b) Example of tilt and decentration evaluation with customized Matlab code demonstrated with a raw image of Pentacam. For study data, a geometric distortion correction of the image was applied before data analysis
![Figure 2. (a) Example of rotational stability evaluation performed with Photoshop. The reference axis is drawn by joining two critical details (e.g. Axenfeld-loops, limbal vessels) and the comparison axis is drawn by joining the IOL toric markings. (b) Example of tilt and decentration evaluation with customized Matlab code demonstrated with a raw image of Pentacam. For study data, a geometric distortion correction of the image was applied before data analysis](/cms/asset/4c6c8cf2-599f-4228-aae2-5b478b2aee6e/icey_a_1929329_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Preoperative patient demographics; values are expressed as mean ± SD and median (range)
Table 2. IOL rotation at different follow-up stages to the entire study population
Figure 3. IOL rotational stability boxplot for all eyes from end of surgery (EoS) to each follow-up and in between follow-ups
![Figure 3. IOL rotational stability boxplot for all eyes from end of surgery (EoS) to each follow-up and in between follow-ups](/cms/asset/9485ccf5-eb2e-4215-a193-1b82c4bd23f6/icey_a_1929329_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 3. Mean (± SD) absolute tilt and decentration values for the right eyes (n = 24) and left eyes (n = 21)
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.