Figures & data
Figure 1. Micro-renewal projects by province, 2021.
![Figure 1. Micro-renewal projects by province, 2021.](/cms/asset/9dc8bde3-1922-435d-9182-439f46183bab/rurb_a_2159651_f0001_ob.jpg)
Figure 2. Conceptual framework.
![Figure 2. Conceptual framework.](/cms/asset/ccc8ed68-ac9e-48b9-b009-7211a78cf548/rurb_a_2159651_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. The goals and scope of micro-renewal.
Table 2. Case study neighborhoods for survey and interview fieldwork.
Figure 3. Images of two case study neighborhoods (Taken by author in 2021). a: Tancun (redevelopment). b: Yinggang (micro-renewal).
![Figure 3. Images of two case study neighborhoods (Taken by author in 2021). a: Tancun (redevelopment). b: Yinggang (micro-renewal).](/cms/asset/4fe8d779-980e-458c-98df-d6c9d811a82c/rurb_a_2159651_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 3. Profiles of survey respondents by neighborhood.
Table 4. Key variables in survey data analysis.
Figure 4. (a) Specifications of path analysis Model 1 (Step 1). (b) Specifications of path analysis Model 2 (Step 2).
![Figure 4. (a) Specifications of path analysis Model 1 (Step 1). (b) Specifications of path analysis Model 2 (Step 2).](/cms/asset/3d1bba52-981a-44d7-a5cc-dd6a8c30f99e/rurb_a_2159651_f0004_oc.jpg)
Table 5. Mean change in neighborhood attachment by key variables.
Figure 5. Path analysis result (Model 1), standardized effects.
Notes: ap<0.1; * p<0.05; ** p< 0.01; *** p< 0.001.
![Figure 5. Path analysis result (Model 1), standardized effects.Notes: ap<0.1; * p<0.05; ** p< 0.01; *** p< 0.001.](/cms/asset/6ec3e277-3eec-43b8-8fd1-f40ee1528308/rurb_a_2159651_f0005_oc.jpg)
Table 6. Unstandardized effects (Model 1).
Table 6. Continued
Figure 6. Path analysis model result (Model 2), standardized effects.
Notes: ap<0.1; * p<0.05; ** p< 0.01; *** p< 0.001.
![Figure 6. Path analysis model result (Model 2), standardized effects.Notes: ap<0.1; * p<0.05; ** p< 0.01; *** p< 0.001.](/cms/asset/41beeeaa-ce93-4d7c-8bed-8ea79560d9ae/rurb_a_2159651_f0006_oc.jpg)
Table 7. Unstandardized effects (Model 2).
Table 7. Contined