1,509
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Laboratory Evaluation of the Survival of Fish Impinged on Modified Traveling Water Screens

&
Pages 359-372 | Received 28 Jun 2013, Accepted 25 Oct 2013, Published online: 28 Mar 2014

Figures & data

FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram of the test flume, including the isolation screen, traveling water screen, collection trough, and collection net.
FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram of the test flume, including the isolation screen, traveling water screen, collection trough, and collection net.

TABLE 1. Summary of pertinent P-values from the maximum likelihood estimates for the mortality regression models for all species tested. Asterisks denote significant differences at P < 0.05; down arrows indicate that mortality decreased significantly with increasing fish length and plus signs that treatment fish exhibited significantly greater mortality than control fish.

TABLE 2. Summary of pertinent P-values from the maximum likelihood estimates for the injury regression models for all species tested. See Table 1 for additional details.

TABLE 3. Summary of pertinent P-values from the maximum likelihood estimates for the scale loss regression models for all species tested. See Table 1 for additional details.

TABLE 4. Percentages of fish collected by species, collection time, and velocity treatment. At the end of the 2-h test, free-swimming fish upstream of the traveling water screen were moved toward the screen with a mechanical crowder; these fish were held and evaluated separately and designated as “crowded” in this table.

TABLE 5. Mean ± SE FL, total number of fish tested (n), percent dead 48 h after testing, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), by species and velocity. Confidence intervals were calculated using the normal approximation of a binomial distribution. Freshwater Drum, lacking forked tails, were measured to total length.

TABLE 6. Percent injury by species and velocity.

TABLE 7. Percent scale loss category by velocity and species.

FIGURE 2. Distribution of injury types for the 886 fish with injuries.
FIGURE 2. Distribution of injury types for the 886 fish with injuries.