254
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Implementation of a pediatric asthma management program in rural primary care clinics

, PhD, ABPPORCID Icon, , PhD, , BA, , DNP, APRN, PNP-BC, AE-C, , MDORCID Icon, , PhDORCID Icon, , PhDORCID Icon & , PhDORCID Icon show all
Pages 1080-1087 | Received 17 Feb 2022, Accepted 03 Oct 2022, Published online: 20 Oct 2022
 

Abstract

Objective

Rural communities experience a significant asthma burden. We pilot tested the implementation of Easy Breathing, a decision support program for improving primary care provider adherence to asthma guidelines in a rural community, and characterized asthma risk factors for enrollees.

Methods

We implemented Easy Breathing in two rural primary care practices for two years. Patient demographics, exposure histories, asthma severity, asthma medications, and treatment plans were collected. Providers’ adherence to guidelines included the frequency of children with persistent asthma who were prescribed guidelines-based therapy and the frequency of children with a written asthma treatment plan on file. Clinicians provided feedback on the feasibility and acceptability of Easy Breathing using a validated survey tool and through semi-structured interviews.

Results

Two providers implemented the program. Enrollment included 518 children, of whom 135 (26%) had physician-confirmed asthma. After enrollment into Easy Breathing, 75% of children with asthma received a written asthma treatment plan All children with persistent asthma were prescribed an anti-inflammatory drug as part of their treatment plan. Providers (n = 2) rated Easy breathing as highly acceptable (M = 4.5), feasible (M = 4.5), and appropriate (M = 4.5). Qualitative feedback was positive, with suggestions to integrate the paper-based program into the electronic health record system for broader uptake. Enrollees with asthma were more likely to have a family history of asthma and endorse exposure to tobacco smoke and cockroaches.

Conclusions

Easy Breathing shows promise as a decision support system that can be implemented in rural, medically underserved communities via primary care.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the UF Clinical and Translational Science Institute, which is supported in part by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under award number UL1TR001427. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.