Figures & data
FIG. 1 Cross-sectional area of the miniature pipe bundle heat exchanger. Pipe inner diameter d i = 0.99 mm, outer diameter d o = 1.59 mm. Aerosol flow around the cooling tubes flown through by cooling air.
![FIG. 1 Cross-sectional area of the miniature pipe bundle heat exchanger. Pipe inner diameter d i = 0.99 mm, outer diameter d o = 1.59 mm. Aerosol flow around the cooling tubes flown through by cooling air.](/cms/asset/ae2cfdbb-49bd-4d65-aa73-3f8d5ed9e76c/uast_a_9705893_o_f0001g.gif)
FIG. 3 Longitudinal section of the pipe bundle heat exchanger. Note the symmetrical design of the deposition device.
![FIG. 3 Longitudinal section of the pipe bundle heat exchanger. Note the symmetrical design of the deposition device.](/cms/asset/e753956c-c59e-430a-8e04-faebe3789059/uast_a_9705893_o_f0003g.gif)
FIG. 4 Schematic flow diagram of the experimental setup for counterflow heat exchanger particle deposition measurements.
![FIG. 4 Schematic flow diagram of the experimental setup for counterflow heat exchanger particle deposition measurements.](/cms/asset/1c0a32e1-8f2b-48ba-a7a1-c99795560af8/uast_a_9705893_o_f0004g.gif)
TABLE 1 Experimental parameters for the investigation of the particle deposition mechanisms in the miniature pipe bundle heat exchanger
FIG. 5 Soot-particle size distributions measured before and after the heat exchanger in experiment Ia (arithmetic mean ± standard deviation of 6 measurements each).
![FIG. 5 Soot-particle size distributions measured before and after the heat exchanger in experiment Ia (arithmetic mean ± standard deviation of 6 measurements each).](/cms/asset/ab0b6ebd-1459-4537-bfdf-16e2245973b9/uast_a_9705893_o_f0005g.gif)
FIG. 6 Total particle deposition efficiencies ϵtot,i and isothermal losses ϵiso,i in the pipe bundle heat exchanger for experiments Ia–Id. Data points with error bars represent the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation of 11 differential measurement values.
![FIG. 6 Total particle deposition efficiencies ϵtot,i and isothermal losses ϵiso,i in the pipe bundle heat exchanger for experiments Ia–Id. Data points with error bars represent the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation of 11 differential measurement values.](/cms/asset/20a5b170-d359-491d-ba70-f9943c30f5e7/uast_a_9705893_o_f0006g.gif)
FIG. 7 Total particle deposition efficiencies ϵtot,i , isothermal losses ϵiso,i , and thermophoretic deposition efficiencies ϵth,i calculated with f(iso,th) = −ϵth,i · ϵiso,I and f(iso,th) = 0, respectively, for experiment Ia. Data points with error bars represent the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation of 11 differential measurement values; dashed line illustrates ϵth,avg calculated with f(iso,th) = −ϵth,i · ϵiso,i .
![FIG. 7 Total particle deposition efficiencies ϵtot,i , isothermal losses ϵiso,i , and thermophoretic deposition efficiencies ϵth,i calculated with f(iso,th) = −ϵth,i · ϵiso,I and f(iso,th) = 0, respectively, for experiment Ia. Data points with error bars represent the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation of 11 differential measurement values; dashed line illustrates ϵth,avg calculated with f(iso,th) = −ϵth,i · ϵiso,i .](/cms/asset/cc5b8163-61e9-4b64-a77e-aec1061f5e93/uast_a_9705893_o_f0007g.gif)
FIG. 8 Total particle deposition efficiency ϵtot,avg plotted against the dimensionless precipitator number calculated from average flow parameters, (Lμ0Δ T log,mean)/(v 0ρ0 T 0 H ch 2). The lines are linear least-squares fits to the data sets with different cooling air flow rates (5 l min− 1 dotted; 10 l min− 1 dashed). Error bars represent the standard deviation (±1 s.d.) of the averaged values ϵtot,i .
![FIG. 8 Total particle deposition efficiency ϵtot,avg plotted against the dimensionless precipitator number calculated from average flow parameters, (Lμ0Δ T log,mean)/(v 0ρ0 T 0 H ch 2). The lines are linear least-squares fits to the data sets with different cooling air flow rates (5 l min− 1 dotted; 10 l min− 1 dashed). Error bars represent the standard deviation (±1 s.d.) of the averaged values ϵtot,i .](/cms/asset/df10c9ee-e3f1-44a2-b3b1-beddf6b1ca08/uast_a_9705893_o_f0008g.gif)
FIG. 9 Thermophoretic particle deposition efficiency ϵth,avg plotted against the dimensionless precipitator number calculated from average flow parameters, (Lμ0Δ T log,mean)/(v 0ρ0 T 0 H ch 2). The lines are linear least-squares fits to the data sets with different cooling air flow rates (5 l min− 1 dotted; 10 l min− 1 dashed) and the theoretical relation for a plate precipitator (solid). Error bars represent the standard deviation (±1 s.d.) of the averaged values ϵth,i .
![FIG. 9 Thermophoretic particle deposition efficiency ϵth,avg plotted against the dimensionless precipitator number calculated from average flow parameters, (Lμ0Δ T log,mean)/(v 0ρ0 T 0 H ch 2). The lines are linear least-squares fits to the data sets with different cooling air flow rates (5 l min− 1 dotted; 10 l min− 1 dashed) and the theoretical relation for a plate precipitator (solid). Error bars represent the standard deviation (±1 s.d.) of the averaged values ϵth,i .](/cms/asset/b4042983-c1b3-4631-99a3-37e26489cd96/uast_a_9705893_o_f0009g.gif)
FIG. 10 Thermophoretic particle deposition efficiency ϵth,i plotted against the dimensionless precipitator number calculated from effective flow parameters at the hot inlet, (L *μ h,inΔ T h,in)/(v h,inρ h,in T h,in H ch 2). The line is the theoretical relation for a plate precipitator. Error bars represent the standard deviation (±1 s.d.) of the averaged values ϵth,i .
![FIG. 10 Thermophoretic particle deposition efficiency ϵth,i plotted against the dimensionless precipitator number calculated from effective flow parameters at the hot inlet, (L *μ h,inΔ T h,in)/(v h,inρ h,in T h,in H ch 2). The line is the theoretical relation for a plate precipitator. Error bars represent the standard deviation (±1 s.d.) of the averaged values ϵth,i .](/cms/asset/31dbf73d-2df9-4537-bfc3-32f7227850b5/uast_a_9705893_o_f0010g.gif)