Figures & data
TABLE 1 Summary of experiments performed
FIG. 1b (b) Experimental setup used to measure size distribution, charge, and capture efficiency of MS2 Virion particles in a soft X-ray enhanced electrostatic precipitator. FCE, Faraday Cup Electrometer.
![FIG. 1b (b) Experimental setup used to measure size distribution, charge, and capture efficiency of MS2 Virion particles in a soft X-ray enhanced electrostatic precipitator. FCE, Faraday Cup Electrometer.](/cms/asset/2d65a0a3-5539-4391-b369-7c2c64aeff84/uast_a_9705895_o_f0001bg.gif)
FIG. 3 MS2 particle size distribution aerosolized by (a) a Collison nebulizer without neutralizer, (b) stainless steel atomizer without neutralizer, (c) nebulizer with neutralizer, (d) nebulizer with soft X-ray, and (e) nebulizer with neutralizer and soft X-ray. The SMPS system had an impactor to remove large agglomerates prior to entry into the Kr-85 neutralizer, and a negative voltage was applied to the central DMA electrode.
![FIG. 3 MS2 particle size distribution aerosolized by (a) a Collison nebulizer without neutralizer, (b) stainless steel atomizer without neutralizer, (c) nebulizer with neutralizer, (d) nebulizer with soft X-ray, and (e) nebulizer with neutralizer and soft X-ray. The SMPS system had an impactor to remove large agglomerates prior to entry into the Kr-85 neutralizer, and a negative voltage was applied to the central DMA electrode.](/cms/asset/a7796cb2-258c-4bca-89dc-c5e16ba904a9/uast_a_9705895_o_f0003g.gif)
TABLE 2 Integral properties of measured size distributions under a variety of conditions (Set 2, )
FIG. 4 SEM images of MS2 agglomerates: (a) suspensions in solution, (b) airborne virion particles after nebulization.
![FIG. 4 SEM images of MS2 agglomerates: (a) suspensions in solution, (b) airborne virion particles after nebulization.](/cms/asset/57e451ad-cf8a-4001-8dfc-efdf620a7dfc/uast_a_9705895_o_f0004g.gif)
FIG. 5 (a) Electrometer current measured for different particle electrical mobilities set using a DMA. (b) Particle concentrations at different particle electrical mobilities set using a DMA.
![FIG. 5 (a) Electrometer current measured for different particle electrical mobilities set using a DMA. (b) Particle concentrations at different particle electrical mobilities set using a DMA.](/cms/asset/779dad0a-73d0-46aa-9d32-9f58777a4fa8/uast_a_9705895_o_f0005g.gif)
FIG. 6 Calculated average particle charge at the ESP outlet with varying applied voltages from −10 to 10 kV.
![FIG. 6 Calculated average particle charge at the ESP outlet with varying applied voltages from −10 to 10 kV.](/cms/asset/2c30f878-500e-43fe-adb5-43524334fc4b/uast_a_9705895_o_f0006g.gif)
FIG. 7 (a) Capture efficiency of different particle diameter viral particles from 10 to 225 nm for various applied voltages and soft X-ray irradiation. (b) Log capture of viral aerosols as a function of applied voltage.
![FIG. 7 (a) Capture efficiency of different particle diameter viral particles from 10 to 225 nm for various applied voltages and soft X-ray irradiation. (b) Log capture of viral aerosols as a function of applied voltage.](/cms/asset/c4a25f77-5c8e-4b50-ad7c-44eec620e60e/uast_a_9705895_o_f0007g.gif)