1,650
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Real-Time Measurements of Black Carbon Indoors and Outdoors: A Comparison of the Photoelectric Aerosol Sensor and the Aethalometer

Pages 1015-1025 | Received 26 Apr 2005, Accepted 20 Sep 2005, Published online: 23 Feb 2007

Figures & data

FIG. 1 Diurnal variation of PAS and Aethalometer readings (January-March 2000). Relative standard errors (not shown) ranged from 2–4% for the Aethalometers and 3–11% for the PAS instruments (N = 15,523 5-minute averages).

FIG. 1 Diurnal variation of PAS and Aethalometer readings (January-March 2000). Relative standard errors (not shown) ranged from 2–4% for the Aethalometers and 3–11% for the PAS instruments (N = 15,523 5-minute averages).

TABLE 1 Spearman correlations between instruments

FIG. 2 PAS (top) and Aethalometer (bottom) around Christmas 1999, and (bottom).

FIG. 2 PAS (top) and Aethalometer (bottom) around Christmas 1999, and (bottom).

FIG. 3 Woodburning on the night of January 29, 2000 as detected by the outdoor Aethalometer and PAS 2000 instrument.

FIG. 3 Woodburning on the night of January 29, 2000 as detected by the outdoor Aethalometer and PAS 2000 instrument.

FIG. 4 Comparison of PAS signal to Aethalometer values for the “woodburning” periods (8 PM to 4 AM on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings) between December 22, 1999 and February 27, 2000.

FIG. 4 Comparison of PAS signal to Aethalometer values for the “woodburning” periods (8 PM to 4 AM on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings) between December 22, 1999 and February 27, 2000.

FIG. 5 Outdoor and indoor Aethalometer and PAS readings during morning rush hour on February 7, 2000.

FIG. 5 Outdoor and indoor Aethalometer and PAS readings during morning rush hour on February 7, 2000.

FIG. 6 Comparison of the outdoor PAS 2000 with the Aethalometer for the period January–February, 2000, during the 6–9 AM rush hour on weekdays.

FIG. 6 Comparison of the outdoor PAS 2000 with the Aethalometer for the period January–February, 2000, during the 6–9 AM rush hour on weekdays.

FIG. 7 Decay rates of indoor Aethalometer and PAS readings after a 1-minute burn of a Citronella candle in the basement utility room.

FIG. 7 Decay rates of indoor Aethalometer and PAS readings after a 1-minute burn of a Citronella candle in the basement utility room.

TABLE 2 Comparison of concentrations with and without four sources active

TABLE 3 Relationships between PAS and EC (or BC) measurements in previous studies (fA/μg/m3)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.