746
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Experimental and Modeling Studies of the Stream-Wise Filter Vibration Effect on the Filtration Efficiency

, , , &
Pages 389-395 | Received 05 May 2005, Accepted 16 Feb 2006, Published online: 22 Nov 2006

Figures & data

FIG. 1 Schematic diagram of the filter vibration test system.

FIG. 1 Schematic diagram of the filter vibration test system.

FIG. 2 Size distributions of ARD generated by an atomizer and a fluidized bed.

FIG. 2 Size distributions of ARD generated by an atomizer and a fluidized bed.

FIG. 3 SEM photographs of ARD generated by an atomizer (a), (b) and by a fluidized bed (c), (d).

FIG. 3 SEM photographs of ARD generated by an atomizer (a), (b) and by a fluidized bed (c), (d).

FIG. 4 Filtration efficiency as a function of particle size for different face velocities.

FIG. 4 Filtration efficiency as a function of particle size for different face velocities.

FIG. 5 Filtration efficiency for different vibration peak velocities (a) Vf = 3 cm/s; (b) Vf = 5 cm/s; (c) Vf = 10 cm/s.

FIG. 5 Filtration efficiency for different vibration peak velocities (a) Vf = 3 cm/s; (b) Vf = 5 cm/s; (c) Vf = 10 cm/s.

FIG. 6 Single fiber efficiency as a function of Peclet number for the static conditions with various face velocities.

FIG. 6 Single fiber efficiency as a function of Peclet number for the static conditions with various face velocities.

FIG. 7 Single fiber efficiency as a function of Peclet for the various vibration conditions (a) 10 Hz; (b) 30 Hz.

FIG. 7 Single fiber efficiency as a function of Peclet for the various vibration conditions (a) 10 Hz; (b) 30 Hz.

FIG. 8 The constants (a) C1 (r2 = 0.9323) and (b) C2 (r2 = 0.9344) of Equation (Equation7).

FIG. 8 The constants (a) C1 (r2 = 0.9323) and (b) C2 (r2 = 0.9344) of Equation (Equation7).

FIG. 9 Vibration effect on the particle impaction deposition.

FIG. 9 Vibration effect on the particle impaction deposition.

FIG. 10 Comparison between experimental results and the modeling for the various vibration conditions (a) Vf = 3 cm/s; (b) Vf = 5 cm/s; (c) Vf = 10 cm/s.

FIG. 10 Comparison between experimental results and the modeling for the various vibration conditions (a) Vf = 3 cm/s; (b) Vf = 5 cm/s; (c) Vf = 10 cm/s.

FIG. 11 Comparison between the experimental results and the modeling results for the different test filter.

FIG. 11 Comparison between the experimental results and the modeling results for the different test filter.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.