1,494
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An Inter-Comparison of Two Black Carbon Aerosol Instruments and a Semi-Continuous Elemental Carbon Instrument in the Urban Environment

&
Pages 463-474 | Received 29 Oct 2006, Accepted 16 Jan 2007, Published online: 08 May 2007

Figures & data

TABLE 1 Published values for the specific attenuation cross-section of ambient aerosols

FIG. 1 Comparisons of semi-continuous thermal EC (Sunset Labs instrument) with integrated filter measurements of EC () and with absorption coefficients (bap) as determined by two co-located PSAPs ( and ). PSAP data is segregated by transmittance values and by instrument in and , respectively. The resulting slope of these plots represents the specific attenuation cross-section (σATN). Two PSAPs were used sequentially during the study. Regression statistics for each subset are available in in the supplemental materials accompanying this article.

FIG. 1 Comparisons of semi-continuous thermal EC (Sunset Labs instrument) with integrated filter measurements of EC (Figure 1a) and with absorption coefficients (bap) as determined by two co-located PSAPs (Figures 1b and 1c). PSAP data is segregated by transmittance values and by instrument in Figures 1b and 1c, respectively. The resulting slope of these plots represents the specific attenuation cross-section (σATN). Two PSAPs were used sequentially during the study. Regression statistics for each subset are available in Table S1 in the supplemental materials accompanying this article.

FIG. 2 Comparison of absorption coefficients (bap) determined by two co-located Aethalometers. Aethalometer #1 utilized the standard “high-sensitivity” collection spot while Aethalometer #2 was fitted with the optional “extended-range” collection head. Six of the seven available wavelengths are shown. All values are in Mm−1.

FIG. 2 Comparison of absorption coefficients (bap) determined by two co-located Aethalometers. Aethalometer #1 utilized the standard “high-sensitivity” collection spot while Aethalometer #2 was fitted with the optional “extended-range” collection head. Six of the seven available wavelengths are shown. All values are in Mm−1.

FIG. 3 Comparison of absorption coefficients determined by PSAP and Aethalometer. PSAP data is segregated by transmittance in and by instrument in . Note that while the correlation between the two instruments is strong, the slope demonstrates a significant deviation from a 1:1 relationship. Regression statistics for each subset are available in in the supplemental materials accompanying this article.

FIG. 3 Comparison of absorption coefficients determined by PSAP and Aethalometer. PSAP data is segregated by transmittance in Figure 3a and by instrument in Figure 3b. Note that while the correlation between the two instruments is strong, the slope demonstrates a significant deviation from a 1:1 relationship. Regression statistics for each subset are available in Table S1 in the supplemental materials accompanying this article.

FIG. 4 Comparison of hourly thermal EC (Sunset Labs RT instrument) and absorption coefficients as determined by Aethalometer #1. Although significant zero-offsets are observed, a strong correlation between attenuation and thermal EC across a wide range of wavelengths is demonstrated by these plots. As in and , the slopes represent the specific attenuation cross section (σATN). Six of the seven available wavelengths are shown.

FIG. 4 Comparison of hourly thermal EC (Sunset Labs RT instrument) and absorption coefficients as determined by Aethalometer #1. Although significant zero-offsets are observed, a strong correlation between attenuation and thermal EC across a wide range of wavelengths is demonstrated by these plots. As in Figure 1b and Figure 1c, the slopes represent the specific attenuation cross section (σATN). Six of the seven available wavelengths are shown.

FIG. 5 The wavelength dependence of the slopes (σ ATN) and intercepts shown in .

FIG. 5 The wavelength dependence of the slopes (σ ATN) and intercepts shown in Figure 4.

FIG. 6 Comparison of the performance of PSAP and Aethalometer filters. and show a side-by-side comparison of absorption coefficients and transmittance values, respectively, from two co-located PSAPs both using the tissue-glass filters. and show side-by-side comparisons of bap values and transmittance values from the same two instruments when one of the tissue-glass filters is replace with the tissue-quartz filter used in the Aethalometer (in effect, changing both reference and sample filters). Dashed lines in the transmittance plots represent the 1:1 line.

FIG. 6 Comparison of the performance of PSAP and Aethalometer filters. Figures 6a and 6b show a side-by-side comparison of absorption coefficients and transmittance values, respectively, from two co-located PSAPs both using the tissue-glass filters. Figures 6c and 6d show side-by-side comparisons of bap values and transmittance values from the same two instruments when one of the tissue-glass filters is replace with the tissue-quartz filter used in the Aethalometer (in effect, changing both reference and sample filters). Dashed lines in the transmittance plots represent the 1:1 line.

TABLE 2 Specific attenuation cross-section (σATN) measured in this study

FIG. 7 Diurnal variations in the light absorbing properties of ambient aerosols during SOAR along with selected bulk chemical measurements. Similar patterns in weekday σ ATN are observed in data from the Aethalometer and PSAP (). These patterns appear related to the OC/EC ratio () and changes in Åap () but unrelated to average OC () and EC () concentrations. Error bars shown represent standard error. n = 504 hours.

FIG. 7 Diurnal variations in the light absorbing properties of ambient aerosols during SOAR along with selected bulk chemical measurements. Similar patterns in weekday σ ATN are observed in data from the Aethalometer and PSAP (Figure 7a). These patterns appear related to the OC/EC ratio (Figure 7b) and changes in Åap (Figure 7e) but unrelated to average OC (Figure 7c) and EC (Figure 7d) concentrations. Error bars shown represent standard error. n = 504 hours.

FIG. S1 Specific attenuation cross section (σATN) values for Fridays demonstrate two distinct populations. The morning values (open circles) demonstrate a low attenuation cross section, presumably due to an infusion of fresh, externally mixed LAC from morning rush-hour traffic. During the afternoon and evening (closed circles), σATN is distinctly lower, representing the dominance of externally mixed LAC. The result of these distinct populations of σATN is a significant intercept in the linear relationship between ATN and EC mass concentration. The slope of the bap/EC line during the morning (dashed line) is significantly lower than that of the afternoon/evening line (upper line). The best fit line though all points results in an intercept due to the influence of morning data and this may be a primary cause of the intercepts seen in the relationship between ATN reported by both the PSAP and the Aethalometer and EC mass concentration.

FIG. S1 Specific attenuation cross section (σATN) values for Fridays demonstrate two distinct populations. The morning values (open circles) demonstrate a low attenuation cross section, presumably due to an infusion of fresh, externally mixed LAC from morning rush-hour traffic. During the afternoon and evening (closed circles), σATN is distinctly lower, representing the dominance of externally mixed LAC. The result of these distinct populations of σATN is a significant intercept in the linear relationship between ATN and EC mass concentration. The slope of the bap/EC line during the morning (dashed line) is significantly lower than that of the afternoon/evening line (upper line). The best fit line though all points results in an intercept due to the influence of morning data and this may be a primary cause of the intercepts seen in the relationship between ATN reported by both the PSAP and the Aethalometer and EC mass concentration.

TABLE S1 Regression statistics for subsets of data shown in and . All statistics were calculated using SPSS for Windows v.13.0

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.