Figures & data
FIG. 1 The influence of the fiber charge density, q F , on the fractional single fiber efficiency calculated for the neutral and bipolarly charged fibers; U 0 = 0.129 m/s, d F = 7.84 μ m, and α = 0.069.
![FIG. 1 The influence of the fiber charge density, q F , on the fractional single fiber efficiency calculated for the neutral and bipolarly charged fibers; U 0 = 0.129 m/s, d F = 7.84 μ m, and α = 0.069.](/cms/asset/9ba77e13-f152-47aa-91c7-efac720d74f9/uast_a_280963_o_f0001g.gif)
FIG. 2 Effect of the polarization force parameter (variable particle diameter) on the single fiber deposition efficiency due to electrostatic forces for q F = 1 nC/m (left) and q F = 5 nC/m (right).
![FIG. 2 Effect of the polarization force parameter (variable particle diameter) on the single fiber deposition efficiency due to electrostatic forces for q F = 1 nC/m (left) and q F = 5 nC/m (right).](/cms/asset/09af6d09-794c-421e-aad6-dd851e7bb8b9/uast_a_280963_o_f0002g.gif)
FIG. 3 Effect of the polarization force parameter (variable fiber charge density) on the single fiber deposition efficiency due to electrostatic forces for d P = 0.1 μ m (left) and d P = 1 μ m (right).
![FIG. 3 Effect of the polarization force parameter (variable fiber charge density) on the single fiber deposition efficiency due to electrostatic forces for d P = 0.1 μ m (left) and d P = 1 μ m (right).](/cms/asset/c22375a2-7832-407b-b9ec-4aab1ab14e92/uast_a_280963_o_f0003g.gif)
FIG. 4 Collection of all numerical data (points) obtained using the BD method and comparison with individual fits to Equation (Equation22) for fixed q F values (thin dotted lines) and with global fits (two thick, solid and dashed lines, for various ranges of N σ 0 variability).
![FIG. 4 Collection of all numerical data (points) obtained using the BD method and comparison with individual fits to Equation (Equation22) for fixed q F values (thin dotted lines) and with global fits (two thick, solid and dashed lines, for various ranges of N σ 0 variability).](/cms/asset/1a19b6b0-a2d1-4a4f-81ea-60aa848cc40f/uast_a_280963_o_f0004g.gif)
FIG. 5 (a) Effect of gas velocity (left) and (b) effect of fiber diameter (right) on the Δ E el (N σ 0) relationship.
![FIG. 5 (a) Effect of gas velocity (left) and (b) effect of fiber diameter (right) on the Δ E el (N σ 0) relationship.](/cms/asset/dbb65d91-b42c-4867-8416-3436103412ea/uast_a_280963_o_f0005g.gif)
TABLE 1 Characteristics of the respirator investigated experimentally by CitationBałazy et al. (2006)
FIG. 6 Validation of the results of direct BD simulations using experimental data of CitationBałazy et al. (2006) obtained for a commercial respirator.
![FIG. 6 Validation of the results of direct BD simulations using experimental data of CitationBałazy et al. (2006) obtained for a commercial respirator.](/cms/asset/c35eb860-7bfc-4f1b-9d52-c1b8bfb3ec55/uast_a_280963_o_f0006g.gif)
FIG. 7 Comparison of various correlations Δ E el (N σ 0) with experimental data of CitationKim et al. (2005) for an electrically active resin wool filter.
![FIG. 7 Comparison of various correlations Δ E el (N σ 0) with experimental data of CitationKim et al. (2005) for an electrically active resin wool filter.](/cms/asset/71d5be9c-5309-485c-9538-5fd25c64587d/uast_a_280963_o_f0007g.gif)
FIG. 8 Comparison of various correlations Δ E el (N σ 0) with experimental data of CitationLee et al. (2002) for a melt-blown polypropylene electret filter.
![FIG. 8 Comparison of various correlations Δ E el (N σ 0) with experimental data of CitationLee et al. (2002) for a melt-blown polypropylene electret filter.](/cms/asset/27fd150d-2a74-418d-a704-26f65309dd45/uast_a_280963_o_f0008g.gif)