Figures & data
TABLE 1 Methods used to validate and/or represent interactions between nanoparticle collisions
FIG. 3 Schematic representing the (a) Case 1 binding method (van der Waals interactions) and (b) Case 2 binding method (Coulomb forces). The gray particles are particles existing within the computational boundary, and the black particle is the new particle searching for a binding site. The gray particle circled in black is the randomly chosen particle for binding.
![FIG. 3 Schematic representing the (a) Case 1 binding method (van der Waals interactions) and (b) Case 2 binding method (Coulomb forces). The gray particles are particles existing within the computational boundary, and the black particle is the new particle searching for a binding site. The gray particle circled in black is the randomly chosen particle for binding.](/cms/asset/2f6f67cd-d84b-4174-ab43-dbdf098af29d/uast_a_439216_o_f0003g.gif)
FIG. 4 Simulation results for a b as a function of P1 for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.
![FIG. 4 Simulation results for a b as a function of P1 for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.](/cms/asset/6fed1cef-aa78-42f6-97a1-2c8445877a75/uast_a_439216_o_f0004g.gif)
FIG. 5 Simulation results for notched box plots of the effect of P1 on aspect ratio a b for N = (a) 20, (b) 60, and (c) 100.
![FIG. 5 Simulation results for notched box plots of the effect of P1 on aspect ratio a b for N = (a) 20, (b) 60, and (c) 100.](/cms/asset/0f89bea1-b4ae-4082-ad3e-8c15ae8e62f0/uast_a_439216_o_f0005g.gif)
FIG. 6 Simulation results of the effect of P1 on average main chain length normalized by particle radius, L m /r, for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.
![FIG. 6 Simulation results of the effect of P1 on average main chain length normalized by particle radius, L m /r, for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.](/cms/asset/419ad738-effa-4597-afad-30ac86eacf76/uast_a_439216_o_f0006g.gif)
FIG. 7 Simulation results of the effect of P1 on normalized main chain length, L m /(Nr), for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.
![FIG. 7 Simulation results of the effect of P1 on normalized main chain length, L m /(Nr), for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.](/cms/asset/202ba02e-215d-462e-8bb6-f8eb4c124e3b/uast_a_439216_o_f0007g.gif)
FIG. 8 Simulation results for notched box plots of the effect of P1 on L m /r when N = (a) 20, (b) 60, and (c) 100.
![FIG. 8 Simulation results for notched box plots of the effect of P1 on L m /r when N = (a) 20, (b) 60, and (c) 100.](/cms/asset/5737120b-78e5-436f-b8bf-dfef5189ade4/uast_a_439216_o_f0008g.gif)
FIG. 9 Simulation results for the effects of P1 on average radius of gyration, R g /r, for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.
![FIG. 9 Simulation results for the effects of P1 on average radius of gyration, R g /r, for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.](/cms/asset/d2a61bfb-15b6-496c-9803-b107cd5ac1f4/uast_a_439216_o_f0009g.gif)
FIG. 11 Simulation results for fractal dimension D f and fractal pre-factor A as a function of P1 using 3D data and 2D projections of the 3D data.
![FIG. 11 Simulation results for fractal dimension D f and fractal pre-factor A as a function of P1 using 3D data and 2D projections of the 3D data.](/cms/asset/4680f751-696e-4a70-9a83-0aefa7fac12c/uast_a_439216_o_f0011g.gif)
FIG. 12 Simulation results of the effects of P1 on the ratio of L m in 2D to R g in 3D for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.
![FIG. 12 Simulation results of the effects of P1 on the ratio of L m in 2D to R g in 3D for cluster sizes N = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100.](/cms/asset/4153c5b7-2c5d-4416-8d11-4eef6d6dadcb/uast_a_439216_o_f0012g.gif)
FIG. 14 2D projections of 3D model of agglomerate I at different angles of orientation: (a) −55°, (b) 0°, (c) +55°, (d) +110°, and (e) 165°.
![FIG. 14 2D projections of 3D model of agglomerate I at different angles of orientation: (a) −55°, (b) 0°, (c) +55°, (d) +110°, and (e) 165°.](/cms/asset/1bc03cf3-63ba-44dc-a715-9d9264eba247/uast_a_439216_o_f0014g.jpg)