Figures & data
FIG. 6 The comparison of the dependencies A i (R a ) and A e (R a ) with experimental data from CitationGibson and Ogden (1977) and CitationDavies and Subari (1982).
![FIG. 6 The comparison of the dependencies A i (R a ) and A e (R a ) with experimental data from CitationGibson and Ogden (1977) and CitationDavies and Subari (1982).](/cms/asset/56ae831c-870b-4b8c-90b3-ed310f7c551d/uast_a_445082_o_f0006g.gif)
TABLE 1
FIG. 7 The comparison of the dependencies A i (R a ) and A e (R a ) with the aspiration efficiencies, obtained by the formulas from , for various values of St.
![FIG. 7 The comparison of the dependencies A i (R a ) and A e (R a ) with the aspiration efficiencies, obtained by the formulas from Table 1, for various values of St.](/cms/asset/119747aa-dbf1-423c-85af-946868e7dfbe/uast_a_445082_o_f0007g.gif)
FIG. 8 The cross-sectional area of the limiting particle trajectory surface far from the sampler at St = 1 and various R a .
![FIG. 8 The cross-sectional area of the limiting particle trajectory surface far from the sampler at St = 1 and various R a .](/cms/asset/19c21c48-c948-44af-b0c8-754c92a0aebc/uast_a_445082_o_f0008g.gif)
FIG. 9 The particle trajectories at St = 1 for R a = 0.1. Dashed lines are the trajectories of particles deposited on the sampler surface.
![FIG. 9 The particle trajectories at St = 1 for R a = 0.1. Dashed lines are the trajectories of particles deposited on the sampler surface.](/cms/asset/cd536765-9168-432e-aa90-a2e441013f73/uast_a_445082_o_f0009g.gif)
FIG. 10 The dependencies of the aspiration efficiency on R a with and without gravity influence for various St and fixed Fr (a) and for fixed St and various R c (b).
![FIG. 10 The dependencies of the aspiration efficiency on R a with and without gravity influence for various St and fixed Fr (a) and for fixed St and various R c (b).](/cms/asset/c1a373c1-6ea5-45ff-8c76-94195d3847a8/uast_a_445082_o_f0010g.gif)
FIG. 12 The comparison of A(R a ), obtained from numerical model and approximate formula (8) for fixed Fr and various St (a) and for fixed St and various R c (b)
![FIG. 12 The comparison of A(R a ), obtained from numerical model and approximate formula (8) for fixed Fr and various St (a) and for fixed St and various R c (b)](/cms/asset/97d39415-a0cc-448e-978a-a76303ae74e6/uast_a_445082_o_f0012g.gif)