1,076
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Seasonal Variation of Airborne Particle Deposition Efficiency in the Human Respiratory System

, &
Pages 795-804 | Received 30 Jul 2010, Accepted 21 Jan 2011, Published online: 18 Mar 2011

Figures & data

TABLE 1 Average concentration, MMAD, and GSD of measured species during the Fresno summer and winter sampling events. Note that trace element concentrations are shown in ng m−3 while OC, EC, and water-soluble ions are shown in μg m−3

FIG. 1 Relative MOUDI size distributions of individual species. Concentrations are normalized to maximum observed PM1.8 concentrations (values in the parenthesis). Dashed lines represent summer while solid lines represent winter.

FIG. 1 Relative MOUDI size distributions of individual species. Concentrations are normalized to maximum observed PM1.8 concentrations (values in the parenthesis). Dashed lines represent summer while solid lines represent winter.

FIG. 2 Average MOUDI nitrate size distribution and respiratory deposition fractions during the Fresno summer and winter sampling events.

FIG. 2 Average MOUDI nitrate size distribution and respiratory deposition fractions during the Fresno summer and winter sampling events.

FIG. 3 (a–c) Nitrate deposition versus PM1.8 specific nitrate concentrations and (d–f) PM1.8 total mass concentrations during the Fresno summer and winter sampling events. Plots a, b, and c show specific deposition efficiencies while plots d, e, and f show total deposition efficiencies.

FIG. 3 (a–c) Nitrate deposition versus PM1.8 specific nitrate concentrations and (d–f) PM1.8 total mass concentrations during the Fresno summer and winter sampling events. Plots a, b, and c show specific deposition efficiencies while plots d, e, and f show total deposition efficiencies.

FIG. 4 Average total deposition efficiency in all regions of the respiratory tract comparing component deposition and PM1.8 total mass concentrations using least squares method. Units are μg of each component deposited per μg PM1.8 total mass inhaled. Error bars represent 95% CI.

FIG. 4 Average total deposition efficiency in all regions of the respiratory tract comparing component deposition and PM1.8 total mass concentrations using least squares method. Units are μg of each component deposited per μg PM1.8 total mass inhaled. Error bars represent 95% CI.

FIG. 5 Specific deposition efficiencies comparing component deposition and PM1.8 component mass concentrations using least squares method. Units are represented as μg of each component deposited per μg PM1.8 component mass inhaled. Error bars represent 95% CI.

FIG. 5 Specific deposition efficiencies comparing component deposition and PM1.8 component mass concentrations using least squares method. Units are represented as μg of each component deposited per μg PM1.8 component mass inhaled. Error bars represent 95% CI.
Supplemental material

uast_a_564239_sup_17896056.zip

Download Zip (118.9 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.