Advanced search
Publication Cover
Aerosol Science and Technology Volume 45, 2011 - Issue 11
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,114
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison of the Chemical and Oxidative Characteristics of Particulate Matter (PM) Collected by Different Methods: Filters, Impactors, and BioSamplers

Nancy Daher Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
,
Zhi Ning Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
,
Arthur K. Cho Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
,
Martin Shafer Environmental Chemistry and Technology Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
,
James J. Schauer Environmental Chemistry and Technology Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
&
Constantinos Sioutas Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Pages 1294-1304 | Received 11 Jan 2011, Accepted 09 May 2011, Published online: 04 Jul 2011

Figures & data

FIG. 1 Schematic of experimental setup.

FIG. 1 Schematic of experimental setup.

FIG. 2 Gravimetric PM2.5 mass concentrations of the filter sample, Nano-MOUDI substrate, and BioSampler slurry (unfiltered). The mass concentration of the BioSampler suspension was determined as the difference in the mass gains of the Teflon filter and the BioSampler “after-filter.”

FIG. 2 Gravimetric PM2.5 mass concentrations of the filter sample, Nano-MOUDI substrate, and BioSampler slurry (unfiltered). The mass concentration of the BioSampler suspension was determined as the difference in the mass gains of the Teflon filter and the BioSampler “after-filter.”

FIG. 3 Average mass fractions of ions in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). The mass fraction is defined as the mass ratio of a given species to PM2.5. Error bars represent one standard error.

FIG. 3 Average mass fractions of ions in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). The mass fraction is defined as the mass ratio of a given species to PM2.5. Error bars represent one standard error.

FIG. 4 Average mass fractions of OC and WSOC in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). Error bars represent one standard error.

FIG. 4 Average mass fractions of OC and WSOC in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). Error bars represent one standard error.

FIG. 5 (a) Linear regression analysis between the average mass fractions of water-soluble elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter and Nano-MOUDI. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Plot is presented on a log-log scale. (b) Linear regression analyses between the average mass fractions of water-soluble and recoverable elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter–BioSampler (unfiltered slurry) and Nano-MOUDI–BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Plots are presented on a log-log scale.

FIG. 5 (a) Linear regression analysis between the average mass fractions of water-soluble elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter and Nano-MOUDI. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Plot is presented on a log-log scale. (b) Linear regression analyses between the average mass fractions of water-soluble and recoverable elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter–BioSampler (unfiltered slurry) and Nano-MOUDI–BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Plots are presented on a log-log scale.

FIG. 6 Average mass fractions of total and recoverable elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry; on primary axis in log scale) in addition to the water-solubility fraction of elements as computed from filter measurements (on secondary axis).

FIG. 6 Average mass fractions of total and recoverable elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry; on primary axis in log scale) in addition to the water-solubility fraction of elements as computed from filter measurements (on secondary axis).

FIG. 7 ROS response (in μg of Zymosan units per mg of PM analyzed per sample) of the water extracts of the filter and Nano-MOUDI PM2.5 samples as well as the unfiltered and filtered BioSampler PM2.5 slurry. Error bars represent one standard error.

FIG. 7 ROS response (in μg of Zymosan units per mg of PM analyzed per sample) of the water extracts of the filter and Nano-MOUDI PM2.5 samples as well as the unfiltered and filtered BioSampler PM2.5 slurry. Error bars represent one standard error.

FIG. 8 DTT consumption and DHBA formation rates (in nmol/min/mg of PM analyzed per sample) of the water extracts of the filter and Nano-MOUDI PM2.5 samples and the unfiltered BioSampler PM2.5 slurry. Error bars represent one standard error.

FIG. 8 DTT consumption and DHBA formation rates (in nmol/min/mg of PM analyzed per sample) of the water extracts of the filter and Nano-MOUDI PM2.5 samples and the unfiltered BioSampler PM2.5 slurry. Error bars represent one standard error.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related Research Data

Development of a Two-Stage Virtual Impactor System for High Concentration Enrichment of Ultrafine, PM2.5, and Coarse Particulate Matter
Source: Informa UK Limited
Development and Evaluation of a High-Volume Aerosol-into-Liquid Collector for Fine and Ultrafine Particulate Matter
Source: Informa UK Limited
Atomic Spectrometery update: environmental analysis
Source: Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Linking provided by 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.