Figures & data
FIG. 2 Gravimetric PM2.5 mass concentrations of the filter sample, Nano-MOUDI substrate, and BioSampler slurry (unfiltered). The mass concentration of the BioSampler suspension was determined as the difference in the mass gains of the Teflon filter and the BioSampler “after-filter.”
![FIG. 2 Gravimetric PM2.5 mass concentrations of the filter sample, Nano-MOUDI substrate, and BioSampler slurry (unfiltered). The mass concentration of the BioSampler suspension was determined as the difference in the mass gains of the Teflon filter and the BioSampler “after-filter.”](/cms/asset/8200cb90-fafe-4ad2-9a7a-8f37a8607197/uast_a_590554_o_f0002g.gif)
FIG. 3 Average mass fractions of ions in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). The mass fraction is defined as the mass ratio of a given species to PM2.5. Error bars represent one standard error.
![FIG. 3 Average mass fractions of ions in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). The mass fraction is defined as the mass ratio of a given species to PM2.5. Error bars represent one standard error.](/cms/asset/e630c49a-2af7-48a9-8671-e3e0a0df210b/uast_a_590554_o_f0003g.gif)
FIG. 4 Average mass fractions of OC and WSOC in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). Error bars represent one standard error.
![FIG. 4 Average mass fractions of OC and WSOC in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). Error bars represent one standard error.](/cms/asset/726a6407-95a0-4a56-8a63-1ceec8a8de85/uast_a_590554_o_f0004g.gif)
FIG. 5 (a) Linear regression analysis between the average mass fractions of water-soluble elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter and Nano-MOUDI. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Plot is presented on a log-log scale. (b) Linear regression analyses between the average mass fractions of water-soluble and recoverable elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter–BioSampler (unfiltered slurry) and Nano-MOUDI–BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Plots are presented on a log-log scale.
![FIG. 5 (a) Linear regression analysis between the average mass fractions of water-soluble elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter and Nano-MOUDI. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Plot is presented on a log-log scale. (b) Linear regression analyses between the average mass fractions of water-soluble and recoverable elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter–BioSampler (unfiltered slurry) and Nano-MOUDI–BioSampler (unfiltered slurry). Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Plots are presented on a log-log scale.](/cms/asset/89f0505b-0d90-4aca-b7a8-4cbe550af069/uast_a_590554_o_f0005g.gif)
FIG. 6 Average mass fractions of total and recoverable elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry; on primary axis in log scale) in addition to the water-solubility fraction of elements as computed from filter measurements (on secondary axis).
![FIG. 6 Average mass fractions of total and recoverable elements in PM2.5 samples from the filter, Nano-MOUDI, and BioSampler (unfiltered slurry; on primary axis in log scale) in addition to the water-solubility fraction of elements as computed from filter measurements (on secondary axis).](/cms/asset/2e2bf1b3-ed00-4297-8f56-415ec03ef4eb/uast_a_590554_o_f0006g.gif)