2,641
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Developing an Empirical Equation for Modeling Particle Deposition Velocity onto Inclined Surfaces in Indoor Environments

, &
Pages 1090-1099 | Received 20 Feb 2012, Accepted 10 May 2012, Published online: 07 Jun 2012

Figures & data

FIG. 1 Definition of surface inclination angle: (a) an acute angle; (b) an obtuse angle. (Color figure available online.)

FIG. 1 Definition of surface inclination angle: (a) an acute angle; (b) an obtuse angle. (Color figure available online.)

TABLE 1 Variable parameters in this study

FIG. 2 Particle deposition velocities for various inclination angles with a certain friction velocity (u* = 1 cm/s).

FIG. 2 Particle deposition velocities for various inclination angles with a certain friction velocity (u* = 1 cm/s).

FIG. 3 Comparison of predicted particle deposition velocities by the empirical equation and the modified model for “Fine zone.” Solid line represents perfect match.

FIG. 3 Comparison of predicted particle deposition velocities by the empirical equation and the modified model for “Fine zone.” Solid line represents perfect match.

FIG. 4 Particle deposition velocities for various friction velocities with a certain inclination angle (θ = 45°).

FIG. 4 Particle deposition velocities for various friction velocities with a certain inclination angle (θ = 45°).

FIG. 5 An example for “Zero zone” (u* = 1 cm/s, θ = 90°–180°).

FIG. 5 An example for “Zero zone” (u* = 1 cm/s, θ = 90°–180°).

FIG. 6 An example for “Transition zone” (u* = 1 cm/s, θ = 0°–180°).

FIG. 6 An example for “Transition zone” (u* = 1 cm/s, θ = 0°–180°).

FIG. 7 Comparison of particle deposition rate of a spherical chamber obtained by the empirical equation and experimental data (Cheng Citation1997).

FIG. 7 Comparison of particle deposition rate of a spherical chamber obtained by the empirical equation and experimental data (Cheng Citation1997).

FIG. 8 An example for the comparison of deposition velocities by the three methods: direct, aerodynamic, and physical method (u* = 10 cm/s, θ = 0°, particle density = 500 kg/m3).

FIG. 8 An example for the comparison of deposition velocities by the three methods: direct, aerodynamic, and physical method (u* = 10 cm/s, θ = 0°, particle density = 500 kg/m3).
Supplemental material

uast_a_695096_sup_26300059.zip

Download Zip (591.6 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.