1,211
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An Apparatus for Generating Aged Cigarette Smoke for Controlled Human Exposure Studies

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1246-1255 | Received 30 Nov 2011, Accepted 10 Apr 2012, Published online: 24 Jul 2012

Figures & data

FIG. 1 Design schematic of smoke-aging system, showing smoke generation, dilution, transport, aging, sampling, exposure, and containment.

FIG. 1 Design schematic of smoke-aging system, showing smoke generation, dilution, transport, aging, sampling, exposure, and containment.

FIG. 2 Particle concentration (mg m−3) at sites 1 and 3. Data from the AM510 and DustTrak instruments were adjusted to gravimetric equivalents (by multiplying by a factor of 0.27) to show particle deposition within the system. Mean concentration at site 1 was 1.98 mg m–3. Plateau concentration at site 3 was 1.14 mg m–3. Passage through the aging chamber reduced particle concentration fluctuation.

FIG. 2 Particle concentration (mg m−3) at sites 1 and 3. Data from the AM510 and DustTrak instruments were adjusted to gravimetric equivalents (by multiplying by a factor of 0.27) to show particle deposition within the system. Mean concentration at site 1 was 1.98 mg m–3. Plateau concentration at site 3 was 1.14 mg m–3. Passage through the aging chamber reduced particle concentration fluctuation.

TABLE 1 SMPS particle count, particle size and mass calculations

FIG. 3 Particle concentration in the aged-cigarette-smoke generation system: results from 20 separate experiments testing the effects of aging, input particle concentration, and the addition of paper and cloth to the aging chamber, on particle deposition. Substantial fractions of the total particulate material in the smoke aerosol deposit between site 1 (before the aging chamber) and sites 2 and 3 (after the aging chamber). This result is consistent across particle input values and surface types.

FIG. 3 Particle concentration in the aged-cigarette-smoke generation system: results from 20 separate experiments testing the effects of aging, input particle concentration, and the addition of paper and cloth to the aging chamber, on particle deposition. Substantial fractions of the total particulate material in the smoke aerosol deposit between site 1 (before the aging chamber) and sites 2 and 3 (after the aging chamber). This result is consistent across particle input values and surface types.

FIG. 4 Particle deposition fraction for three surfaces: median, interquartile range, maximum, minimum, and outlying values are shown. Particle deposition is significantly different between cloth surfaces and paper or stainless steel (control) surfaces.

FIG. 4 Particle deposition fraction for three surfaces: median, interquartile range, maximum, minimum, and outlying values are shown. Particle deposition is significantly different between cloth surfaces and paper or stainless steel (control) surfaces.

TABLE 2 Calculated values of deposition decay rate loss coefficient, β, and deposition velocity, VD , through aging chamber

Supplemental material

uast_a_708947_sup_27285867.zip

Download Zip (591.9 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.