2,169
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Investigation of a New Electrostatic Sampler for Concentrating Biological and Non-Biological Aerosol Particles

, , , &
Pages 463-471 | Received 01 Aug 2012, Accepted 13 Dec 2012, Published online: 28 Jan 2013

Figures & data

TABLE 1 Studies on electrostatics precipitators (ESP) designed for the collection of biological materials and their working points; asterisks indicate parameters which were derived from the published data

FIG. 1 Schematic drawing of the sampler.

FIG. 1 Schematic drawing of the sampler.

FIG. 2 Air sampler efficiency evaluated theoretically (left) and experimentally (right) on 0.3–0.35 μm particles as a function of the flow rate and the applied voltage. Experimental values were averaged over four consecutive trials separated by a 4 h operation at full power. These averaged experimental points are represented by circles on the figure.

FIG. 2 Air sampler efficiency evaluated theoretically (left) and experimentally (right) on 0.3–0.35 μm particles as a function of the flow rate and the applied voltage. Experimental values were averaged over four consecutive trials separated by a 4 h operation at full power. These averaged experimental points are represented by circles on the figure.

FIG. 3 Air sampler efficiencies measured on 0.3–0.35 μm particles at a flow rate of 90 LPM as a function of the applied voltage. Trials were separated by a 4 h operation at full power to investigate the stability of the results.

FIG. 3 Air sampler efficiencies measured on 0.3–0.35 μm particles at a flow rate of 90 LPM as a function of the applied voltage. Trials were separated by a 4 h operation at full power to investigate the stability of the results.

FIG. 4 Efficiency evaluated by using different rinsing solutions. Collected spores were eluted with an injection of 15 ml of different types of tensides after a collection time of 3 min and spore numbers were calculated by plate counting. Error bars indicate standard deviation of three collections.

FIG. 4 Efficiency evaluated by using different rinsing solutions. Collected spores were eluted with an injection of 15 ml of different types of tensides after a collection time of 3 min and spore numbers were calculated by plate counting. Error bars indicate standard deviation of three collections.

FIG. 5 Effects of different rinsing methods on spore elution with 1% SDS. Different number and volume of flushes were used as indicated. Numbers of spores were determined by plate counting. Error bars indicate standard deviation of at least two collections.

FIG. 5 Effects of different rinsing methods on spore elution with 1% SDS. Different number and volume of flushes were used as indicated. Numbers of spores were determined by plate counting. Error bars indicate standard deviation of at least two collections.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Information.zip

Download Zip (3.8 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.