Figures & data
TABLE 1 Studies on electrostatics precipitators (ESP) designed for the collection of biological materials and their working points; asterisks indicate parameters which were derived from the published data
FIG. 2 Air sampler efficiency evaluated theoretically (left) and experimentally (right) on 0.3–0.35 μm particles as a function of the flow rate and the applied voltage. Experimental values were averaged over four consecutive trials separated by a 4 h operation at full power. These averaged experimental points are represented by circles on the figure.
![FIG. 2 Air sampler efficiency evaluated theoretically (left) and experimentally (right) on 0.3–0.35 μm particles as a function of the flow rate and the applied voltage. Experimental values were averaged over four consecutive trials separated by a 4 h operation at full power. These averaged experimental points are represented by circles on the figure.](/cms/asset/b82be0aa-6d01-447e-87b9-2da4a444f150/uast_a_763896_o_f0002g.gif)
FIG. 3 Air sampler efficiencies measured on 0.3–0.35 μm particles at a flow rate of 90 LPM as a function of the applied voltage. Trials were separated by a 4 h operation at full power to investigate the stability of the results.
![FIG. 3 Air sampler efficiencies measured on 0.3–0.35 μm particles at a flow rate of 90 LPM as a function of the applied voltage. Trials were separated by a 4 h operation at full power to investigate the stability of the results.](/cms/asset/93064994-a742-4208-acfa-380c4b4e44dc/uast_a_763896_o_f0003g.gif)
FIG. 4 Efficiency evaluated by using different rinsing solutions. Collected spores were eluted with an injection of 15 ml of different types of tensides after a collection time of 3 min and spore numbers were calculated by plate counting. Error bars indicate standard deviation of three collections.
![FIG. 4 Efficiency evaluated by using different rinsing solutions. Collected spores were eluted with an injection of 15 ml of different types of tensides after a collection time of 3 min and spore numbers were calculated by plate counting. Error bars indicate standard deviation of three collections.](/cms/asset/f7973a07-0c1d-408a-8168-72b6385536d3/uast_a_763896_o_f0004g.gif)
FIG. 5 Effects of different rinsing methods on spore elution with 1% SDS. Different number and volume of flushes were used as indicated. Numbers of spores were determined by plate counting. Error bars indicate standard deviation of at least two collections.
![FIG. 5 Effects of different rinsing methods on spore elution with 1% SDS. Different number and volume of flushes were used as indicated. Numbers of spores were determined by plate counting. Error bars indicate standard deviation of at least two collections.](/cms/asset/c662d566-eec9-477b-a6bc-4b4fb1e66ee6/uast_a_763896_o_f0005g.gif)