2,669
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Aerosol Research Letter

The CPMA-Electrometer System—A Suspended Particle Mass Concentration Standard

, &
Pages i-iv | Received 24 Jul 2012, Accepted 24 Apr 2013, Published online: 24 May 2013

Figures & data

FIG. 1 Proposed scheme—aerosol is charged, classified by mass:charge ratio by the CPMA, producing a stream of particles of total mass concentration m total, which is split and sampled by both an aerosol electrometer and a challenge instrument. To better match instrument flow rates, particle-free make-up air could be added before the splitter.

FIG. 1 Proposed scheme—aerosol is charged, classified by mass:charge ratio by the CPMA, producing a stream of particles of total mass concentration m total, which is split and sampled by both an aerosol electrometer and a challenge instrument. To better match instrument flow rates, particle-free make-up air could be added before the splitter.

The cutoff diameter of unit density uncharged particles through a CPMA with radii of 60 mm and 61 mm, length of 200 mm, speed ratio of 0.97, and flow rate of 1.5 lpm, as a function of rotational speed, both with and without the unipolar charger described in the text upstream of the CPMA. The inset shows the uncharged particle fraction as a function of particle diameter for a CPMA rotating at 1000 rpm, a unipolar charger, a radioactive neutralizer, and downstream of a unipolar charger and CPMA in series.

The cutoff diameter of unit density uncharged particles through a CPMA with radii of 60 mm and 61 mm, length of 200 mm, speed ratio of 0.97, and flow rate of 1.5 lpm, as a function of rotational speed, both with and without the unipolar charger described in the text upstream of the CPMA. The inset shows the uncharged particle fraction as a function of particle diameter for a CPMA rotating at 1000 rpm, a unipolar charger, a radioactive neutralizer, and downstream of a unipolar charger and CPMA in series.

FIG. 3 Mass concentration of silicone oil measured by the CPMA-electrometer method compared with gravimetric measurements. Error bars for the CPMA method are as taken from the analysis in the text, those for the filter paper assume 1% uncertainty for the flow and for each weighing—a coverage factor of 2 is assumed. The inset shows the spectral form of the oil aerosol.

FIG. 3 Mass concentration of silicone oil measured by the CPMA-electrometer method compared with gravimetric measurements. Error bars for the CPMA method are as taken from the analysis in the text, those for the filter paper assume 1% uncertainty for the flow and for each weighing—a coverage factor of 2 is assumed. The inset shows the spectral form of the oil aerosol.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Information.zip

Download Zip (110.7 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.