1,260
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Accelerating the Lagrangian Method for Modeling Transient Particle Transport in Indoor Environments

, , &
Pages 351-361 | Received 17 Dec 2014, Accepted 13 Mar 2015, Published online: 18 Apr 2015

Figures & data

FIG. 1. Configuration of the chamber studied by Zhang et al. (Citation2009).

FIG. 1. Configuration of the chamber studied by Zhang et al. (Citation2009).

TABLE 1 Cases designed to verify the method of estimating the necessary particle number

FIG. 2. Particle number independence tests for (a) Case 1, (b) Case 2, and (c) Case 3.

FIG. 2. Particle number independence tests for (a) Case 1, (b) Case 2, and (c) Case 3.

FIG. 3. Comparison of normalized particle concentrations predicted by the combined Lagrangian and superimposition method and the pure Lagrangian method.

FIG. 3. Comparison of normalized particle concentrations predicted by the combined Lagrangian and superimposition method and the pure Lagrangian method.

FIG. 4. Factor of reduction in particle number as a function of particle source duration when the superimposition method is used.

FIG. 4. Factor of reduction in particle number as a function of particle source duration when the superimposition method is used.

FIG. 5. Comparison of normalized particle concentrations predicted by the combined Lagrangian and time-averaging method and the pure Lagrangian method for (a) Case 1 and (b) Case 3.

FIG. 5. Comparison of normalized particle concentrations predicted by the combined Lagrangian and time-averaging method and the pure Lagrangian method for (a) Case 1 and (b) Case 3.

FIG. 6. Comparison of normalized particle concentrations predicted by the combined Lagrangian, superimposition, and time-averaging method and the pure Lagrangian method.

FIG. 6. Comparison of normalized particle concentrations predicted by the combined Lagrangian, superimposition, and time-averaging method and the pure Lagrangian method.

TABLE 2 Comparison of computing cost

FIG. 7. Comparison of the numerical results for transient particle concentration with the corresponding experimental data: (a) Point 1 and (b) Point 2.

FIG. 7. Comparison of the numerical results for transient particle concentration with the corresponding experimental data: (a) Point 1 and (b) Point 2.

FIG. 8. Comparison of normalized particle concentrations predicted by the Lagrangian method with particle numbers that were estimated using α values of 1%, 10%, and 100%.

FIG. 8. Comparison of normalized particle concentrations predicted by the Lagrangian method with particle numbers that were estimated using α values of 1%, 10%, and 100%.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.