Figures & data
Table 1. List of commercially available portable aerosol sizers (based on particle electric mobility technique).
Table 2. Key dimensions of two studied mini-plate DMAs, units: inch (mm).
Figure 3. Comparison of central voltage for particle sizing among experimental data, calculated data with and without correction: (a) for DMA-1 and (b) for DMA-2.
![Figure 3. Comparison of central voltage for particle sizing among experimental data, calculated data with and without correction: (a) for DMA-1 and (b) for DMA-2.](/cms/asset/10428572-0cae-4ef8-a217-4a085fa7fb0d/uast_a_1149547_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. Correction factor, η, as a function of aerosol-to-sheath flow rate ratio, β, for studied mini-plate DMAs.
![Figure 4. Correction factor, η, as a function of aerosol-to-sheath flow rate ratio, β, for studied mini-plate DMAs.](/cms/asset/3da928d4-8228-46dc-8d92-cb48bf8ca279/uast_a_1149547_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. (a) Comparison of experimental and calculated TDMA curves for DMA-1 and DMA-2; (b) typical transfer functions of DMA-1 and DMA-2 for 100 nm particle size, obtained via the linear-piecewise function deconvolution scheme, when operated at the aerosol-to-sheath flow rate ratio of 0.1.
![Figure 5. (a) Comparison of experimental and calculated TDMA curves for DMA-1 and DMA-2; (b) typical transfer functions of DMA-1 and DMA-2 for 100 nm particle size, obtained via the linear-piecewise function deconvolution scheme, when operated at the aerosol-to-sheath flow rate ratio of 0.1.](/cms/asset/27fec8e5-6585-400f-9e87-39e4b81d286d/uast_a_1149547_f0005_b.gif)
Figure 6. Comparison of the area (a), height (b), and FWHM (c) of the transfer function for mini-plate DMA-1 at various operational flow conditions. Also included in the figure are the experimental transfer function data of PAMS DMA presented in AAAR 2011 (Qi et al. Citation2011).
![Figure 6. Comparison of the area (a), height (b), and FWHM (c) of the transfer function for mini-plate DMA-1 at various operational flow conditions. Also included in the figure are the experimental transfer function data of PAMS DMA presented in AAAR 2011 (Qi et al. Citation2011).](/cms/asset/5f17fa3d-9319-4b99-9e5e-911cb269c240/uast_a_1149547_f0006_b.gif)
Figure 7. Comparison of area (a), height (b), and FWHM (c) of mini-plate DMA-2 and DMA-2 at the aerosol and sheath flow rate of 0.3 and 3.0 lpm, respectively.
![Figure 7. Comparison of area (a), height (b), and FWHM (c) of mini-plate DMA-2 and DMA-2 at the aerosol and sheath flow rate of 0.3 and 3.0 lpm, respectively.](/cms/asset/f6f0b8be-aaae-4d0a-8c54-2a49b12c3a0e/uast_a_1149547_f0007_b.gif)