1,294
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
New Generation of Aerosol Instrumentation for Distributed or Personal Sampling

Experimental evaluation of miniature plate DMAs (mini-plate DMAs) for future ultrafine particle (UFP) sensor network

&
Pages 297-307 | Received 23 Jul 2015, Accepted 24 Jan 2016, Published online: 22 Mar 2016

Figures & data

Table 1. List of commercially available portable aerosol sizers (based on particle electric mobility technique).

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of studied mini-plate DMA: (a) the sectional view and (b) the top view.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of studied mini-plate DMA: (a) the sectional view and (b) the top view.

Table 2. Key dimensions of two studied mini-plate DMAs, units: inch (mm).

Figure 2. Experimental setup for the performance evaluation of mini-plate DMAs.

Figure 2. Experimental setup for the performance evaluation of mini-plate DMAs.

Figure 3. Comparison of central voltage for particle sizing among experimental data, calculated data with and without correction: (a) for DMA-1 and (b) for DMA-2.

Figure 3. Comparison of central voltage for particle sizing among experimental data, calculated data with and without correction: (a) for DMA-1 and (b) for DMA-2.

Figure 4. Correction factor, η, as a function of aerosol-to-sheath flow rate ratio, β, for studied mini-plate DMAs.

Figure 4. Correction factor, η, as a function of aerosol-to-sheath flow rate ratio, β, for studied mini-plate DMAs.

Figure 5. (a) Comparison of experimental and calculated TDMA curves for DMA-1 and DMA-2; (b) typical transfer functions of DMA-1 and DMA-2 for 100 nm particle size, obtained via the linear-piecewise function deconvolution scheme, when operated at the aerosol-to-sheath flow rate ratio of 0.1.

Figure 5. (a) Comparison of experimental and calculated TDMA curves for DMA-1 and DMA-2; (b) typical transfer functions of DMA-1 and DMA-2 for 100 nm particle size, obtained via the linear-piecewise function deconvolution scheme, when operated at the aerosol-to-sheath flow rate ratio of 0.1.

Figure 6. Comparison of the area (a), height (b), and FWHM (c) of the transfer function for mini-plate DMA-1 at various operational flow conditions. Also included in the figure are the experimental transfer function data of PAMS DMA presented in AAAR 2011 (Qi et al. Citation2011).

Figure 6. Comparison of the area (a), height (b), and FWHM (c) of the transfer function for mini-plate DMA-1 at various operational flow conditions. Also included in the figure are the experimental transfer function data of PAMS DMA presented in AAAR 2011 (Qi et al. Citation2011).

Figure 7. Comparison of area (a), height (b), and FWHM (c) of mini-plate DMA-2 and DMA-2 at the aerosol and sheath flow rate of 0.3 and 3.0 lpm, respectively.

Figure 7. Comparison of area (a), height (b), and FWHM (c) of mini-plate DMA-2 and DMA-2 at the aerosol and sheath flow rate of 0.3 and 3.0 lpm, respectively.
Supplemental material

UAST_1149547_Supplementary_File.zip

Download Zip (28.7 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.