1,221
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Analytical expression for the friction coefficient of DLCA aggregates based on extended Kirkwood–Riseman theory

, &
Pages 766-777 | Received 11 Jan 2017, Accepted 20 Feb 2017, Published online: 16 Mar 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Friction factor results for fractal aggregates with primary sphere diameter 19.5 nm in ambient air (Kn = 7). TDMA and DMA-APM results (Shin et al. Citation2009, Citation2010) are shown for comparison.

Figure 1. Friction factor results for fractal aggregates with primary sphere diameter 19.5 nm in ambient air (Kn = 7). TDMA and DMA-APM results (Shin et al. Citation2009, Citation2010) are shown for comparison.

Figure 2. Comparison of self-consistent field results to other models for the scalar friction factor for (a) Kn = 100, (b) Kn = 10, (c) Kn = 1, and (d) Kn = 0.1. Results are for particles in ambient air. Where appropriate, free molecular results from a ballistic algorithm and continuum results from the Zeno code are displayed for reference.

Figure 2. Comparison of self-consistent field results to other models for the scalar friction factor for (a) Kn = 100, (b) Kn = 10, (c) Kn = 1, and (d) Kn = 0.1. Results are for particles in ambient air. Where appropriate, free molecular results from a ballistic algorithm and continuum results from the Zeno code are displayed for reference.

Figure 3. Ratio of friction coefficients from other models to our results for N = 2000. Free molecule and continuum results are calculated using our own Monte Carlo algorithm and the Zeno algorithm, respectively. For the upper plot, our friction coefficient results are obtained using the calculated drag from the BGK model. For the lower plot, our friction coefficient results use the Cunningham slip formula for the monomer friction coefficient ( in Equation (Equation18)). Free molecule results for Kn < 15, LF results for Kn < 35, and continuum results for Kn > 15 are more than twice our self-consistent field results and thus do not appear in the plots above.

Figure 3. Ratio of friction coefficients from other models to our results for N = 2000. Free molecule and continuum results are calculated using our own Monte Carlo algorithm and the Zeno algorithm, respectively. For the upper plot, our friction coefficient results are obtained using the calculated drag from the BGK model. For the lower plot, our friction coefficient results use the Cunningham slip formula for the monomer friction coefficient ( in Equation (Equation18[18] )). Free molecule results for Kn < 15, LF results for Kn < 35, and continuum results for Kn > 15 are more than twice our self-consistent field results and thus do not appear in the plots above.

Figure 4. Normalized friction coefficient results for a range of aggregate sizes.

Figure 4. Normalized friction coefficient results for a range of aggregate sizes.

Figure 5. Relationship between the mobility radius and the radius of gyration for several Knudsen numbers.

Figure 5. Relationship between the mobility radius and the radius of gyration for several Knudsen numbers.

Figure 6. Normalized friction coefficient as a function of the primary sphere Knudsen number and the number of primary spheres, N, calculated using Equation (Equation38). Friction coefficients are normalized by Stokes' law evaluated at the specified Knudsen number.

Figure 6. Normalized friction coefficient as a function of the primary sphere Knudsen number and the number of primary spheres, N, calculated using Equation (Equation38[38] ). Friction coefficients are normalized by Stokes' law evaluated at the specified Knudsen number.

Figure 7. Error of our harmonic sum model for the friction coefficient, Equation (Equation38), relative to our Kirkwood–Riseman friction coefficient results for a range of Knudsen numbers. Error is calculated with Equation (Equation39); the Kirkwood–Riseman results in this equation use the monomer friction coefficient from Stokes' law instead of the friction coefficient computed from the BGK model.

Figure 7. Error of our harmonic sum model for the friction coefficient, Equation (Equation38[38] ), relative to our Kirkwood–Riseman friction coefficient results for a range of Knudsen numbers. Error is calculated with Equation (Equation39[39] ); the Kirkwood–Riseman results in this equation use the monomer friction coefficient from Stokes' law instead of the friction coefficient computed from the BGK model.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.