3,615
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Experimental and numerical study of the performance of upper-room ultraviolet germicidal irradiation with the effective Z-value of airborne bacteria

, , &
Pages 1123-1134 | Received 14 Dec 2016, Accepted 16 May 2017, Published online: 06 Jun 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. The configuration of the chamber. All dimensions are in m.

Figure 1. The configuration of the chamber. All dimensions are in m.

Figure 2. The eZ-value of S. marcescens (ATCC 6911). Each value is the average of three measured values and error bar represents the standard deviation.

Figure 2. The eZ-value of S. marcescens (ATCC 6911). Each value is the average of three measured values and error bar represents the standard deviation.

Figure 3. The eZ-value of S. epidermidis (ATCC 12228). Each value for UR-UVGI off and on is the average of four and three measured values, respectively. Error bar represents the standard deviation.

Figure 3. The eZ-value of S. epidermidis (ATCC 12228). Each value for UR-UVGI off and on is the average of four and three measured values, respectively. Error bar represents the standard deviation.

Figure 4. The eZ-value of P. alcaligenes (ATCC 14909). Each value for UR-UVGI off and on is the average of two and three measured values, respectively. Error bar represents the standard deviation.

Figure 4. The eZ-value of P. alcaligenes (ATCC 14909). Each value for UR-UVGI off and on is the average of two and three measured values, respectively. Error bar represents the standard deviation.

Figure 5. The eZ-value of M. luteus (ATCC 4698). Each value is the average of four measured values and error bar represents the standard deviation.

Figure 5. The eZ-value of M. luteus (ATCC 4698). Each value is the average of four measured values and error bar represents the standard deviation.

Table 1. The UV susceptibility constants (Z) of test bacteria reported in references Beggs et al. (Citation2006), Kowalski (Citation2009), Noakes et al. Citation(2004a), and Yang et al. (Citation2012).

Figure 6. Comparisons of the present simulation and the experiment of Yang et al. (Citation2012) and the simulation of Yang et al. (Citation2016). The inactivation rate (kuv) of experiment is the difference of the slopes derived from “Ventilation” and “Ventilation + UR-UVGI.” Each point value is the average values of location A, B, and C at w = 2.05 m (Figures 5(d) and 6(d) in Yang et al. Citation2012). Error bar represents the standard deviation.

Figure 6. Comparisons of the present simulation and the experiment of Yang et al. (Citation2012) and the simulation of Yang et al. (Citation2016). The inactivation rate (kuv) of experiment is the difference of the slopes derived from “Ventilation” and “Ventilation + UR-UVGI.” Each point value is the average values of location A, B, and C at w = 2.05 m (Figures 5(d) and 6(d) in Yang et al. Citation2012). Error bar represents the standard deviation.

Figure 7. The average concentration of the tested bacteria in breathing zone (w ≤ 1.68 m) (Cb) with IrV = 0.284 W/m2 for different ACHs.

Figure 7. The average concentration of the tested bacteria in breathing zone (w ≤ 1.68 m) (Cb) with IrV = 0.284 W/m2 for different ACHs.
Supplemental material

UAST_1334108_Supplementary_File.zip

Download Zip (1.8 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.